NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M270

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q285% better
7,153.57% of 104,598
Radeon R7 M270
1,857.52% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q has 285% better performance than the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
No data available
Radeon R7 M270
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Shop Radeon R7 M270
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2018. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1050 Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1050 Max-Q includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,139 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1050 Max-Q has the 217th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R7 M270 GPU

The AMD Radeon R7 M270 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Opal) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R7 M270 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R7 M270 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 725 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 825 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R7 M270 has the 370th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.78% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QRadeon R7 M270
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitecturePascalGCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2018Q1 2014
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Ghost Recon Breakpoint

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-QRadeon R7 M270
Low - 720p
81 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
35 FPS
--
High - 1080p
23 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
17 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
12 FPS
--
4K UHD - 2160p
5 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q orRadeon R7 M270

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q orRadeon R7 M270
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q285% better
7,153.57% of 104,598
Radeon R7 M270
1,857.52% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q has 285% better performance than the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is ranked 217th with a score of 7,153.5, and the Radeon R7 M270 is ranked 370th with a score of 1,857.5.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
No data available
Radeon R7 M270
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 965M7,322+2%
GeForce GTX 870M7,156+0%
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q7,153.5
Quadro K5100M6,880-4%
Radeon R9 M390 (Mac Edition)6,819-5%
Radeon R7 M2601,897-73%
Radeon R7 M2651,882-74%
Radeon R7 M2701,857.5-74%
GeForce GT 740M1,848-74%
GeForce GT 645M1,844.5-74%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q orRadeon R7 M270
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QRadeon R7 M270
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,615
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,753.5
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
35,392
(+456.08%)
6,364.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,649.5
(+349.09%)
1,258
3DMark 11 Performance Score
7,347.5
(+264.82%)
2,014
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
109.5
(+192.78%)
37.4
PassMark G3D Mark
4,070
(+430.64%)
767
PassMark G2D Mark
288
(+85.81%)
155
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
70.2
(+193.72%)
23.9
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
65
(+208.06%)
21.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QRadeon R7 M270
CodenameGP107Opal
ArchitecturePascalGCN 1.0
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors3,300 million950 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QRadeon R7 M270
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth112.1 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,752 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache48 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QRadeon R7 M270
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QRadeon R7 M270
Stream Processors (SP)--384
CUDA Cores640--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)5--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4024
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz725 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,139 MHz825 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QRadeon R7 M270
Pixel Fill Rate18.22 GPixel/s6.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate45.56 GTexel/s19.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,458 GFLOPS633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance45.56 GFLOPS--

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QRadeon R7 M270
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.