PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

NVIDIA
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
GeForce GT 755M
2,800.53% of 104,737
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile950% better
29,41128% of 104,737

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile has 950% better performance than the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 755M
No data available
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 755M and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 755M
Shop RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 755M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,350 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 755M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 980 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,020 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 755M has the 310th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.67% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD106) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile includes 4,608 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,395 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,695 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 144 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 144 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 36 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 115 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile has the 77th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 755MRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureKeplerAda Lovelace
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q1 2023
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
GeForce GT 755MRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
Low - 720p
--
--
Medium - 768p
73 FPS
--
High - 768p
65 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
24 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 755M
2,800.53% of 104,737
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile950% better
29,41128% of 104,737

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile has 950% better performance than the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 755M is ranked 310th with a score of 2,800.5, and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is ranked 77th with a score of 29,411.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 755M
No data available
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 755M and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 755MRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
8,351
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
8,811
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
14,966.5
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,105.5
20,908
(+893.02%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,987.5
27,083
(+806.54%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
288
PassMark G3D Mark
1,696
18,570
(+994.93%)
PassMark G2D Mark
329
806
(+144.98%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
27.8
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
CodenameGK107AD106
ArchitectureKeplerAda Lovelace
Process Size28 nm5 nm
Transistors1,270 million22,900 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
Memory Size2 GB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth86.4 Gb/s256 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,350 MHz2,000 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB32 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W115 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
CUDA Cores3844,608
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)236
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)32144
Render Output Units (ROP)1648
Tensor Cores--144
Ray Tracing Cores--36
Core Clock Speed980 MHz1,395 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,020 MHz1,695 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate8.16 GPixel/s81.36 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate32.64 GTexel/s244.1 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance783.4 GFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance32.64 GFLOPS244.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.