NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 755M
2,800.53% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)30% better
3,637.53% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) has 30% better performance than the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 755M
No data available
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 755M and the Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 755M
Shop Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 755M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,350 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 755M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 980 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,020 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 755M has the 311th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tropo) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M370X has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,125 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 72 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M370X includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 775 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 800 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M370X has the 279th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.48% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 755MRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q2 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
GeForce GT 755MRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
Low - 720p
--
41 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
26 FPS
High - 1080p
--
15 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
8 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 755M
2,800.53% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)30% better
3,637.53% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) has 30% better performance than the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 755M is ranked 311th with a score of 2,800.5, and the Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) is ranked 279th with a score of 3,637.5.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 755M
No data available
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 755M and the Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 675MX3,978.5+42%
Quadro M6203,801+36%
Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)3,637.5+30%
GeForce GTX 670MX3,587+28%
Quadro K3100M3,581+28%
Radeon 610M2,863+2%
Radeon HD 6970M2,818.5+1%
GeForce GT 755M2,800.5
GeForce GTX 485M2,709-3%
Radeon HD 7870M2,702-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 755MRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
14,966.5
15,454.5
(+3.26%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,105.5
2,419
(+14.89%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,987.5
3,991
(+33.59%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
61.3
PassMark G3D Mark
1,689
(+8.76%)
1,553
PassMark G2D Mark
324
355
(+9.57%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
27.8
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
CodenameGK107Tropo
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 1.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,270 million1,500 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth86.4 Gb/s72 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,350 MHz1,125 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
Stream Processors (SP)--640
CUDA Cores384--
Compute Units (CU)--10
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3240
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed980 MHz775 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,020 MHz800 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
Pixel Fill Rate8.16 GPixel/s12.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate32.64 GTexel/s32 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance783.4 GFLOPS1,024 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance32.64 GFLOPS64 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition)
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.