NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD Radeon R5 M330

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 755M66% better
2,800.53% of 104,598
Radeon R5 M330
1,6892% of 104,598

The GeForce GT 755M has 66% better performance than the Radeon R5 M330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 755M
No data available
Radeon R5 M330
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 755M and the Radeon R5 M330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 755M
Shop Radeon R5 M330
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 755M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,350 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 755M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 980 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,020 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 755M has the 311th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R5 M330 GPU

The AMD Radeon R5 M330 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Exo) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R5 M330 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R5 M330 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 955 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,030 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 18 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R5 M330 has the 396th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.61% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 755MRadeon R5 M330
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q2 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
GeForce GT 755MRadeon R5 M330
Low - 768p
--
19 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
12 FPS
High - 1080p
--
6 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
4 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRadeon R5 M330
GPUFrames Per Second
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile83+2,028%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile81+1,977%
GeForce GTX 980M49+1,156%
GeForce GT 740M6.4+64%
Radeon R7 M3604.1+5%
Radeon R5 M3303.9
GeForce 920M3.7-5%
GeForce 910M3.5-10%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRadeon R5 M330
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 755M66% better
2,800.53% of 104,598
Radeon R5 M330
1,6892% of 104,598

The GeForce GT 755M has 66% better performance than the Radeon R5 M330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 755M is ranked 311th with a score of 2,800.5, and the Radeon R5 M330 is ranked 396th with a score of 1,689.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 755M
No data available
Radeon R5 M330
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 755M and the Radeon R5 M330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon 610M2,863+2%
Radeon HD 6970M2,818.5+1%
GeForce GT 755M2,800.5
GeForce GTX 485M2,709-3%
Radeon HD 7870M2,702-4%
GeForce GT 735M1,713-39%
Radeon HD 8750M1,698-39%
Radeon R5 M3301,689-40%
Radeon R5 M4301,689-40%
Radeon R5 M3201,652-41%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRadeon R5 M330
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 755MRadeon R5 M330
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
14,966.5
(+205.63%)
4,897
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,105.5
(+128.36%)
922
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,987.5
(+67.65%)
1,782
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
28
PassMark G3D Mark
1,689
(+183.39%)
596
PassMark G2D Mark
324
526
(+62.35%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
27.8
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R5 M330
CodenameGK107Exo
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 1.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,270 million690 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R5 M330
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth86.4 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,350 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R5 M330
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W18 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R5 M330
Stream Processors (SP)--320
CUDA Cores384--
Compute Units (CU)--5
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3220
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed980 MHz955 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,020 MHz1,030 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R5 M330
Pixel Fill Rate8.16 GPixel/s8.24 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate32.64 GTexel/s20.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance783.4 GFLOPS659.2 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance32.64 GFLOPS41.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon R5 M330
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.