NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 755M
2,800.53% of 104,598
Radeon Pro Vega 20339% better
12,28912% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 339% better performance than the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 755M
No data available
Radeon Pro Vega 20
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 755M and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 755M
Shop Radeon Pro Vega 20
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 755M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,350 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 755M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 980 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,020 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 755M has the 311th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2018. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 12) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro Vega 20 has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 740 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 189.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro Vega 20 includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 815 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,283 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro Vega 20 has the 159th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.75% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 755MRadeon Pro Vega 20
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 5.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q4 2018
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Just Cause 4
Just Cause 4
Display FPS for Darksiders III
Darksiders III
Display FPS for Battlefield V
Battlefield V
Display FPS for Hitman 2
Hitman 2
Display FPS for Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Just Cause 4
Just Cause 4
GeForce GT 755MRadeon Pro Vega 20
Low - 720p
--
76 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
51 FPS
High - 1080p
--
47 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
44 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRadeon Pro Vega 20

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRadeon Pro Vega 20
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 755M
2,800.53% of 104,598
Radeon Pro Vega 20339% better
12,28912% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 339% better performance than the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 755M is ranked 311th with a score of 2,800.5, and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 is ranked 159th with a score of 12,289.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 755M
No data available
Radeon Pro Vega 20
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 755M and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 980M12,517+347%
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile12,340+341%
Radeon Pro Vega 2012,289+339%
Quadro P300012,105+332%
Arc A370M12,089.5+332%
Radeon 610M2,863+2%
Radeon HD 6970M2,818.5+1%
GeForce GT 755M2,800.5
GeForce GTX 485M2,709-3%
Radeon HD 7870M2,702-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 755M orRadeon Pro Vega 20
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 755MRadeon Pro Vega 20
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
2,600.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
2,794.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
14,966.5
62,318
(+316.38%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,105.5
9,043.5
(+329.52%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,987.5
11,934.5
(+299.48%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
129.5
PassMark G3D Mark
1,689
5,300
(+213.8%)
PassMark G2D Mark
324
559
(+72.53%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
27.8
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon Pro Vega 20
CodenameGK107Vega 12
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 5.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors1,270 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon Pro Vega 20
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5HBM2
Memory Bandwidth86.4 Gb/s189.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,350 MHz740 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit1,024 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon Pro Vega 20
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W100 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon Pro Vega 20
Stream Processors (SP)--1,280
CUDA Cores384--
Compute Units (CU)--20
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3280
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Core Clock Speed980 MHz815 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,020 MHz1,283 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon Pro Vega 20
Pixel Fill Rate8.16 GPixel/s41.06 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate32.64 GTexel/s102.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance783.4 GFLOPS3.28 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance32.64 GFLOPS205.3 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 755MRadeon Pro Vega 20
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.0

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.