NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 750M5% better
2,5432% of 104,598
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,598

The GeForce GT 750M has 5% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 750M
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 750M and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 750M
Shop Quadro K3000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 750M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,003 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 750M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 941 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 967 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 750M has the 324th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro K3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The K3000M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 89.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The K3000M includes 576 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 654 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 654 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The K3000M has the 330th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 750MQuadro K3000M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureKeplerKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2013Q2 2012
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
GeForce GT 750MQuadro K3000M
Low - 768p
27 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
17 FPS
--
High - 1080p
10 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
9 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 750M orQuadro K3000M
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon R9 M280X16.6+84%
GeForce MX13013+44%
Quadro M600M12.7+41%
GeForce 940MX11+22%
GeForce MX1109.1+1%
GeForce GT 750M9
Radeon 5308.5-6%
GeForce 940M8-11%
FirePro W4190M7.9-12%
GeForce 930M7.7-14%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 750M orQuadro K3000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 750M5% better
2,5432% of 104,598
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,598

The GeForce GT 750M has 5% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 750M is ranked 324th with a score of 2,543, and the Quadro K3000M is ranked 330th with a score of 2,427.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 750M
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 750M and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 750M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon R9 M265X2,633+4%
GeForce 940MX2,556+1%
GeForce GT 750M2,543
Radeon R7 M3702,524-1%
Radeon HD 7850M2,467-3%
Radeon HD 6950M2,452-4%
Quadro K620M2,434-4%
Quadro K3000M2,427-5%
FirePro M60002,422-5%
GeForce 940M2,405.5-5%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 750M orQuadro K3000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 750MQuadro K3000M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
10,822
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,574
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,655
2,767
(+4.22%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
64.2
--
PassMark G3D Mark
1,330
1,638
(+23.16%)
PassMark G2D Mark
246
340
(+38.21%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
22.3
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 750MQuadro K3000M
CodenameGK107GK104
ArchitectureKeplerKepler
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,270 million3,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 750MQuadro K3000M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64.19 Gb/s89.6 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,003 MHz700 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 750MQuadro K3000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 750MQuadro K3000M
CUDA Cores384576
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)23
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3248
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Core Clock Speed941 MHz654 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)967 MHz654 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 750MQuadro K3000M
Pixel Fill Rate7.74 GPixel/s7.85 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate30.94 GTexel/s31.39 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance742.7 GFLOPS753.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance30.94 GFLOPS31.39 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 750MQuadro K3000M
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.