NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 750M
2,5432% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X117% better
5,514.55% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M385X has 117% better performance than the GeForce GT 750M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 750M
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 750M and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 750M
Shop Radeon R9 M385X
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 750M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,003 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 750M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 941 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 967 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 750M has the 324th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M385X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M385X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Strato) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M385X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 76.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M385X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M385X has the 234th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 750MRadeon R9 M385X
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2013Q2 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
GeForce GT 750MRadeon R9 M385X
Low - 768p
27 FPS
39 FPS(+45.39%)
Medium - 768p
17 FPS
35 FPS(+103.51%)
High - 1080p
10 FPS
20 FPS(+98.99%)
Ultra - 1080p
9 FPS
15 FPS(+68.89%)
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 750M or

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 750M orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 750M
2,5432% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X117% better
5,514.55% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M385X has 117% better performance than the GeForce GT 750M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 750M is ranked 324th with a score of 2,543, and the Radeon R9 M385X is ranked 234th with a score of 5,514.5.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 750M
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 750M and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 750M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 7970M5,645+122%
Radeon HD 6970M X25,541.5+118%
Radeon R9 M385X5,514.5+117%
Radeon Pro 4555,388+112%
FirePro M61005,369+111%
Radeon R9 M265X2,633+4%
GeForce 940MX2,556+1%
GeForce GT 750M2,543
Radeon R7 M3702,524-1%
Radeon HD 7850M2,467-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 750M orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 750MRadeon R9 M385X
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
10,822
22,544
(+108.32%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,574
3,404.5
(+116.3%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,655
4,456.5
(+67.85%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
64.2
(+43.3%)
44.8
PassMark G3D Mark
1,330
1,994
(+49.92%)
PassMark G2D Mark
246
267
(+8.54%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
22.3
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 750MRadeon R9 M385X
CodenameGK107Strato
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 2.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,270 million2,080 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 750MRadeon R9 M385X
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64.19 Gb/s76.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,003 MHz1,200 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 750MRadeon R9 M385X
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 750MRadeon R9 M385X
Stream Processors (SP)--896
CUDA Cores384--
Compute Units (CU)--14
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3256
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed941 MHz1,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)967 MHz1,100 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 750MRadeon R9 M385X
Pixel Fill Rate7.74 GPixel/s17.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate30.94 GTexel/s61.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance742.7 GFLOPS1.97 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance30.94 GFLOPS123.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 750MRadeon R9 M385X
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.