NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 735M
1,7132% of 104,598
GeForce MX550484% better
10,00510% of 104,598

The GeForce MX550 has 484% better performance than the GeForce GT 735M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 735M
No data available
GeForce MX550
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 735M and the GeForce MX550 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 735M
Shop GeForce MX550
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 735M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 735M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 575 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 628 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 735M has the 392nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2021. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117SB) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The MX550 has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX550 includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,065 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,320 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX550 has the 180th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 735MGeForce MX550
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureKepler 2.0Turing
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q4 2021
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for Ghostwire: Tokyo
Ghostwire: Tokyo
Display FPS for GRID Legends
GRID Legends
Display FPS for God of War
God of War
Display FPS for Farming Simulator 22
Farming Simulator 22
Display FPS for Forza Horizon 5
Forza Horizon 5
Display FPS for F1 2021
F1 2021

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
GeForce GT 735MGeForce MX550
Low - 1080p
--
59 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
51 FPS
High - 1080p
--
41 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
28 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 735M orGeForce MX550
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX55028.1
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile5.9-79%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 735M orGeForce MX550
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 735M
1,7132% of 104,598
GeForce MX550484% better
10,00510% of 104,598

The GeForce MX550 has 484% better performance than the GeForce GT 735M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 735M is ranked 392nd with a score of 1,713, and the GeForce MX550 is ranked 180th with a score of 10,005.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 735M
No data available
GeForce MX550
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 735M and the GeForce MX550 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 735M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon 680M10,371+505%
Quadro M4000M10,259+499%
GeForce MX55010,005+484%
GeForce GTX 970M9,877.5+477%
FirePro W7170M9,708+467%
GeForce GT 730M1,722+1%
GeForce 920M1,718.5+0%
GeForce GT 735M1,713
Radeon HD 8750M1,698-1%
Radeon R5 M3301,689-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 735M orGeForce MX550
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 735MGeForce MX550
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
2,470
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
2,800
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6,757
40,364
(+497.37%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,023.5
6,125.5
(+498.49%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,791
10,319.5
(+476.19%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
49.2
173.5
(+252.64%)
PassMark G3D Mark
648
4,544
(+601.23%)
PassMark G2D Mark
128
399
(+211.72%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 735MGeForce MX550
CodenameGK208TU117SB
ArchitectureKepler 2.0Turing
Process Size28 nm12 nm
Transistors1,020 million4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 735MGeForce MX550
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s96 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 735MGeForce MX550
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)33 W25 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 735MGeForce MX550
CUDA Cores3841,024
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)216
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3232
Render Output Units (ROP)816
Core Clock Speed575 MHz1,065 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)628 MHz1,320 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 735MGeForce MX550
Pixel Fill Rate5.02 GPixel/s21.12 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate20.1 GTexel/s42.24 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance482.3 GFLOPS2.7 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance20.1 GFLOPS42.24 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 735MGeForce MX550
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.