NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs AMD FirePro M6000

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 720M
1,2131% of 104,598
FirePro M6000100% better
2,4222% of 104,598

The FirePro M6000 has 100% better performance than the GeForce GT 720M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 720M
No data available
FirePro M6000
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 720M and the FirePro M6000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 720M
Shop FirePro M6000
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF117) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 720M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 12.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 720M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 625 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 938 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 720M has the 432nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.16% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD FirePro M6000 GPU

The AMD FirePro M6000 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2012. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Heathrow) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The FirePro M6000 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FirePro M6000 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 800 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 43 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The FirePro M6000 has the 331st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 720MFirePro M6000
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureFermi 2.0GCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q3 2012
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
Display FPS for New World
New World
Display FPS for Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin
Monster Hunter Stories 2
Display FPS for Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Display FPS for Star Wars: Squadrons
Star Wars: Squadrons

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
GeForce GT 720MFirePro M6000
Low - 720p
11 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 720M orFirePro M6000
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon R5 M25514+27%
GeForce GT 720M11

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 720M orFirePro M6000
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 720M
1,2131% of 104,598
FirePro M6000100% better
2,4222% of 104,598

The FirePro M6000 has 100% better performance than the GeForce GT 720M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 720M is ranked 432nd with a score of 1,213, and the FirePro M6000 is ranked 331st with a score of 2,422.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 720M
No data available
FirePro M6000
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 720M and the FirePro M6000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 720M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro K620M2,434+101%
Quadro K3000M2,427+100%
FirePro M60002,422+100%
GeForce 940M2,405.5+98%
GeForce GTX 570M2,399+98%
GeForce GT 640M LE1,259+4%
Radeon HD 8570M1,255+3%
GeForce GT 720M1,213
Radeon R5 M2301,175-3%
Radeon HD 6750M1,158.5-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 720M orFirePro M6000
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 720MFirePro M6000
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5,426
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
822
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,321
2,726
(+106.36%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
36
--
PassMark G3D Mark
460
1,820
(+295.65%)
PassMark G2D Mark
118
766
(+549.15%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
11.6
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
11.6
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 720MFirePro M6000
CodenameGF117Heathrow
ArchitectureFermi 2.0GCN 1.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors585 million1,500 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 720MFirePro M6000
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth12.8 Gb/s64 Gb/s
Memory Clock800 MHz1,000 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 720MFirePro M6000
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)33 W43 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 720MFirePro M6000
Stream Processors (SP)--640
CUDA Cores96--
Compute Units (CU)--10
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1640
Render Output Units (ROP)816
Core Clock Speed625 MHz800 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)938 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 720MFirePro M6000
Pixel Fill Rate3.1 GPixel/s12.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate12.4 GTexel/s32 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance297.6 GFLOPS1,024 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance24.8 GFLOPS64 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 720MFirePro M6000
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
OpenCL1.12.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.