NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 640M LE
1,2591% of 104,598
Radeon R5 M25542% better
1,7842% of 104,598

The Radeon R5 M255 has 42% better performance than the GeForce GT 640M LE for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 640M LE
No data available
Radeon R5 M255
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 640M LE and the Radeon R5 M255 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 640M LE
Shop Radeon R5 M255
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 640M LE has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 640M LE includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 500 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 570 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 640M LE has the 428th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.20% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R5 M255 GPU

The AMD Radeon R5 M255 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2014. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Topaz) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R5 M255 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 32 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R5 M255 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 925 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 940 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R5 M255 has the 380th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.71% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 640M LERadeon R5 M255
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2012Q4 2014
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Display FPS for Lies of P
Lies of P

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
GeForce GT 640M LERadeon R5 M255
Low - 1080p
--
7 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 640M LE orRadeon R5 M255
GPUFrames Per Second
Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs.

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 640M LE orRadeon R5 M255
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 640M LE
1,2591% of 104,598
Radeon R5 M25542% better
1,7842% of 104,598

The Radeon R5 M255 has 42% better performance than the GeForce GT 640M LE for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 640M LE is ranked 428th with a score of 1,259, and the Radeon R5 M255 is ranked 380th with a score of 1,784.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 640M LE
No data available
Radeon R5 M255
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 640M LE and the Radeon R5 M255 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 640M LE or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 560M1,820+45%
Quadro K2000M1,798+43%
Radeon R5 M3351,784+42%
Radeon R5 M2551,784+42%
GeForce 825M1,756.5+40%
GeForce 820M1,266.5+1%
Quadro 2000M1,261+0%
GeForce GT 640M LE1,259
Radeon HD 8570M1,255-0%
GeForce GT 720M1,213-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 640M LE orRadeon R5 M255
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 640M LERadeon R5 M255
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
6,053
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
1,080.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,385
1,907
(+37.69%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
34.7
PassMark G3D Mark
706
(+32.21%)
534
PassMark G2D Mark
173
(+28.15%)
135
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 640M LERadeon R5 M255
CodenameGK107Topaz
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,270 million1,550 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 640M LERadeon R5 M255
Memory Size1,024 MB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3DDR3
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s32 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,000 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 640M LERadeon R5 M255
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)20 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 640M LERadeon R5 M255
Stream Processors (SP)--384
CUDA Cores384--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3224
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed500 MHz925 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)570 MHz940 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 640M LERadeon R5 M255
Pixel Fill Rate4.56 GPixel/s7.52 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate18.24 GTexel/s22.56 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance437.8 GFLOPS721.9 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance18.24 GFLOPS45.12 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 640M LERadeon R5 M255
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.