NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 640M
1,7282% of 104,598
GeForce MX13066% better
2,8753% of 104,598

The GeForce MX130 has 66% better performance than the GeForce GT 640M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 640M
No data available
GeForce MX130
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 640M and the GeForce MX130 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 640M
Shop GeForce MX130
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 640M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 640M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 624 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 709 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 32 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 640M has the 386th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX130 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2017. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM108S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The MX130 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 40.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX130 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,109 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,189 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 30 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX130 has the 307th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.75% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 640MGeForce MX130
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureKeplerMaxwell
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2012Q4 2017
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Display FPS for Atlas Fallen
Atlas Fallen
Display FPS for Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart
Display FPS for F1 23
F1 23
Display FPS for Riders Republic
Riders Republic

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
GeForce GT 640MGeForce MX130
Low - 1080p
--
8 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 640M orGeForce MX130
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX35026.2+232%
GeForce MX25020+154%
Radeon 540X12.5+59%
Radeon RX 550 Mobile12.1+54%
GeForce MX1307.88

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 640M orGeForce MX130
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 640M
1,7282% of 104,598
GeForce MX13066% better
2,8753% of 104,598

The GeForce MX130 has 66% better performance than the GeForce GT 640M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 640M is ranked 386th with a score of 1,728, and the GeForce MX130 is ranked 307th with a score of 2,875.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 640M
No data available
GeForce MX130
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 640M and the GeForce MX130 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 640M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
FirePro M51002,967+72%
Quadro M600M2,911+68%
GeForce MX1302,875+66%
Radeon 610M2,863+66%
Radeon HD 6970M2,818.5+63%
Radeon R5 M2551,784+3%
GeForce 825M1,756.5+2%
GeForce GT 640M1,728
FirePro M41001,7280%
GeForce GT 730M1,722-0%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 640M orGeForce MX130
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 640MGeForce MX130
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
644.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
724.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
9,024
13,610
(+50.82%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,225
2,345
(+91.43%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,860.5
3,112
(+67.27%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
42.4
78.8
(+85.85%)
PassMark G3D Mark
927
1,838
(+98.27%)
PassMark G2D Mark
197
198
(+0.51%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
27.9
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
28.3
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 640MGeForce MX130
CodenameGK107GM108S
ArchitectureKeplerMaxwell
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,270 million1,020 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 640MGeForce MX130
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s40.1 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 640MGeForce MX130
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)32 W30 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 640MGeForce MX130
CUDA Cores384384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3224
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed624 MHz1,109 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)709 MHz1,189 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 640MGeForce MX130
Pixel Fill Rate5.67 GPixel/s9.51 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate22.69 GTexel/s28.54 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance544.5 GFLOPS913.2 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance22.69 GFLOPS28.54 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 640MGeForce MX130
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.