NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 635M
1,1101% of 104,598
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)1,527% better
18,05817% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 1,527% better performance than the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 635M
No data available
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 635M and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 635M
Shop RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF108) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GT 635M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 635M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 660 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 753 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 635M has the 445th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.06% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) GPU

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is a graphics card by NVIDIA. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A2000 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 893 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,687 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 120th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 635MRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermiAmpere
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2012--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO
GeForce GT 635MRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Low - 768p
167 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
117 FPS
--
High - 768p
82 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
36 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 635M orRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GT 730M52+45%
Radeon HD 7670M46+28%
Radeon R7 M36043.8+22%
GeForce GT 630M38+6%
Radeon HD 7610M38+6%
GeForce GT 635M35.9
Radeon 53035.5-1%
GeForce 910M29.7-17%
Radeon R5 M33526.4-26%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 635M orRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 635M
1,1101% of 104,598
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)1,527% better
18,05817% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 1,527% better performance than the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 635M is ranked 445th with a score of 1,110, and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is ranked 120th with a score of 18,058.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 635M
No data available
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 635M and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 635M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q19,778.5+1,682%
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q18,688+1,584%
RTX A2000 Mobile18,058+1,527%
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)18,058+1,527%
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile18,057+1,527%
Radeon HD 6730M1,141+3%
NVS 5400M1,119+1%
GeForce GT 635M1,110
GeForce 710M1,106.5-0%
Quadro K1000M1,102-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 635M orRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 635MRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
5,016
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
5,523
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
60,336
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
13,157
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,223
17,348
(+1,318.48%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
311
PassMark G3D Mark
560
10,944
(+1,854.29%)
PassMark G2D Mark
170
536
(+215.29%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 635MRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
CodenameGF108--
ArchitectureFermiAmpere
Process Size40 nm8 nm
Transistors585 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 635MRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Memory Size2 GB8 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s192 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,750 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB--
L2 Cache256 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 635MRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W95 W
OutputsDevice Dependent--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 635MRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
CUDA Cores962,560
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1680
Render Output Units (ROP)432
Tensor Cores--80
Ray Tracing Cores--20
Core Clock Speed660 MHz893 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)753 MHz1,687 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 635MRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Pixel Fill Rate1.9 GPixel/s--
Texture Fill Rate7.6 GTexel/s--
FP32 Performance182.4 GFLOPS9.3 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance15.2 GFLOPS--

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 635MRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
DirectX12 (11_0)--
OpenCL1.1--
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.