NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 630M
1,0351% of 104,598
Quadro M2200612% better
7,3727% of 104,598

The Quadro M2200 has 612% better performance than the GeForce GT 630M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 630M
No data available
Quadro M2200
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 630M and the Quadro M2200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 630M
Shop Quadro M2200
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF117) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 630M has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 630M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 800 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 630M has the 453rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.99% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M2200 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2017. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM206) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M2200 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,377 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 88.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M2200 includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 695 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,036 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M2200 has the 214th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 630MQuadro M2200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Maxwell 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2012Q1 2017
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for Rocket League
Rocket League
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
GeForce GT 630MQuadro M2200
Low - 768p
14 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 630M orQuadro M2200
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon R5 M33019+34%
Radeon R5 M25519+34%
Radeon R5 M43018.8+32%
GeForce GT 720M15.2+7%
GeForce 910M14.5+2%
GeForce GT 630M14.2

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 630M orQuadro M2200
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 630M
1,0351% of 104,598
Quadro M2200612% better
7,3727% of 104,598

The Quadro M2200 has 612% better performance than the GeForce GT 630M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 630M is ranked 453rd with a score of 1,035, and the Quadro M2200 is ranked 214th with a score of 7,372.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 630M
No data available
Quadro M2200
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 630M and the Quadro M2200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 630M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile7,678.5+642%
Radeon Pro 560X7,590+633%
Quadro M22007,372+612%
GeForce GTX 965M7,322+607%
GeForce GTX 870M7,156+591%
Radeon HD 7670M1,061.5+3%
Radeon HD 6650M1,037+0%
GeForce GT 630M1,035
NVS 5200M1,008-3%
Radeon HD 6550M993-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 630M orQuadro M2200
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 630MQuadro M2200
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,724
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,903
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5,577
37,796
(+577.71%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
719
5,850
(+713.63%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,168
7,581
(+549.06%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
103.9
PassMark G3D Mark
539
4,294
(+696.66%)
PassMark G2D Mark
151
383
(+153.64%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
10
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 630MQuadro M2200
CodenameGF117GM206
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Maxwell 2.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors585 million2,940 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 630MQuadro M2200
Memory Size1,024 MB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64 Gb/s88.13 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz1,377 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB48 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 630MQuadro M2200
Bus InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)33 W55 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 630MQuadro M2200
CUDA Cores961,024
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1664
Render Output Units (ROP)432
Core Clock Speed800 MHz695 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,036 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 630MQuadro M2200
Pixel Fill Rate2.5 GPixel/s33.15 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate10 GTexel/s66.3 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance240 GFLOPS2.12 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance20 GFLOPS66.3 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 630MQuadro M2200
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.