NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 630M
1,0351% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 460552% better
6,7496% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 460 has 552% better performance than the GeForce GT 630M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 630M
No data available
Radeon Pro 460
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 630M and the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 630M
Shop Radeon Pro 460
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF117) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 630M has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 630M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 800 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 630M has the 453rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.99% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro 460 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 460 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2016. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Baffin) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 460 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 460 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 460 has the 222nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 630MRadeon Pro 460
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureFermi 2.0GCN 4.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2012Q4 2016
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for Rocket League
Rocket League
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
GeForce GT 630MRadeon Pro 460
Low - 720p
--
67 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
25 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
12 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 630M orRadeon Pro 460

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 630M orRadeon Pro 460
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 630M
1,0351% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 460552% better
6,7496% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 460 has 552% better performance than the GeForce GT 630M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 630M is ranked 453rd with a score of 1,035, and the Radeon Pro 460 is ranked 222nd with a score of 6,749.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 630M
No data available
Radeon Pro 460
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 630M and the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 630M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 8970M6,818+559%
Radeon R9 M290X6,817+559%
Radeon Pro 4606,749+552%
Radeon 660M6,743+551%
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)6,736+551%
Radeon HD 7670M1,061.5+3%
Radeon HD 6650M1,037+0%
GeForce GT 630M1,035
NVS 5200M1,008-3%
Radeon HD 6550M993-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 630M orRadeon Pro 460
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 630MRadeon Pro 460
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,374
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5,577
27,064
(+385.28%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
719
4,584
(+537.55%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,168
6,963
(+496.15%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
114.7
PassMark G3D Mark
539
3,453
(+540.63%)
PassMark G2D Mark
151
680
(+350.33%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
10
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 630MRadeon Pro 460
CodenameGF117Baffin
ArchitectureFermi 2.0GCN 4.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors585 million3,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 630MRadeon Pro 460
Memory Size1,024 MB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64 Gb/s81.28 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz1,270 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 630MRadeon Pro 460
Bus InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)33 W35 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 630MRadeon Pro 460
Stream Processors (SP)--1,024
CUDA Cores96--
Compute Units (CU)--16
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1664
Render Output Units (ROP)416
Core Clock Speed800 MHz850 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--907 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 630MRadeon Pro 460
Pixel Fill Rate2.5 GPixel/s14.51 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate10 GTexel/s58.05 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance240 GFLOPS1.86 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance20 GFLOPS116.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 630MRadeon Pro 460
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL1.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.