NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 620M
933.51% of 104,598
GeForce MX330418% better
4,8345% of 104,598

The GeForce MX330 has 418% better performance than the GeForce GT 620M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 620M
No data available
GeForce MX330
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 620M and the GeForce MX330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 620M
Shop GeForce MX330
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2012. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF108) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GT 620M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 620M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 625 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 715 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 620M has the 465th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108B) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX330 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX330 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,531 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,594 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX330 has the 253rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.62% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 620MGeForce MX330
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermiPascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2012Q1 2020
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Display FPS for Outriders
Outriders
Display FPS for Hitman 3
Hitman 3
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
GeForce GT 620MGeForce MX330
Low - 720p
--
62 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
23 FPS
High - 1080p
--
12 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
9 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 620M orGeForce MX330
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX35011.7+32%
GeForce MX4509.92+12%
GeForce MX3308.86

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 620M orGeForce MX330
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 620M
933.51% of 104,598
GeForce MX330418% better
4,8345% of 104,598

The GeForce MX330 has 418% better performance than the GeForce GT 620M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 620M is ranked 465th with a score of 933.5, and the GeForce MX330 is ranked 253rd with a score of 4,834.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 620M
No data available
GeForce MX330
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 620M and the GeForce MX330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 620M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro K5000M4,893+424%
GeForce GTX 770M4,889+424%
GeForce MX3304,834+418%
Radeon R9 M280X4,698+403%
Radeon RX 540 Mobile4,646+398%
Radeon HD 7650M945.5+1%
Quadro 1000M943+1%
GeForce GT 620M933.5
GeForce GT 625M921-1%
GeForce GT 540M888-5%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 620M orGeForce MX330
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 620MGeForce MX330
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,160
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,235.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5,269
20,729
(+293.41%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
737.5
3,762
(+410.1%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
15,787
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,041.5
5,121.5
(+391.74%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
98.2
PassMark G3D Mark
434
2,435
(+461.06%)
PassMark G2D Mark
127
226
(+77.95%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 620MGeForce MX330
CodenameGF108GP108B
ArchitectureFermiPascal
Process Size40 nm14 nm
Transistors585 million1,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 620MGeForce MX330
Memory Size1,024 MB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s56.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,752 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache64 KB48 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 620MGeForce MX330
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W10 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 620MGeForce MX330
CUDA Cores96384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)23
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1624
Render Output Units (ROP)416
Core Clock Speed625 MHz1,531 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)715 MHz1,594 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 620MGeForce MX330
Pixel Fill Rate1.9 GPixel/s25.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate7.6 GTexel/s38.26 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance182.4 GFLOPS1,224 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance15.2 GFLOPS38.26 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 620MGeForce MX330
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.