PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M

NVIDIA
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
GeForce GT 520MX
596.51% of 104,737
GeForce 930M261% better
2,1532% of 104,737

The GeForce 930M has 261% better performance than the GeForce GT 520MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 520MX
No data available
GeForce 930M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 520MX and the GeForce 930M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 520MX
Shop GeForce 930M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2011. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF119) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GT 520MX has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 520MX includes 48 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 520MX has the 505th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce 930M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 930M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2015. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM108S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 930M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 12.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 930M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 549 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 549 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 930M has the 351st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.06% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 520MXGeForce 930M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Maxwell
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2011Q1 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
GeForce GT 520MXGeForce 930M
Low - 720p
--
17 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 520MX orGeForce 930M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce 930MX21.1+21%
GeForce 930M17.4
GeForce MX11017.1-2%
Radeon 53016.5-5%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 520MX orGeForce 930M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 520MX
596.51% of 104,737
GeForce 930M261% better
2,1532% of 104,737

The GeForce 930M has 261% better performance than the GeForce GT 520MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 520MX is ranked 505th with a score of 596.5, and the GeForce 930M is ranked 351st with a score of 2,153.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 520MX
No data available
GeForce 930M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 520MX and the GeForce 930M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 520MX or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 8790M2,186.5+267%
GeForce GTX 480M2,184.5+266%
GeForce 930M2,153+261%
Radeon R7 M3402,148+260%
Radeon R7 M4602,139+259%
GeForce GT 420M685+15%
Radeon HD 6490M601+1%
GeForce GT 520MX596.5
Radeon HD 7450M581.5-3%
Radeon HD 6470M535-10%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 520MX orGeForce 930M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 520MXGeForce 930M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
8,309
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
1,460.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
666
2,247
(+237.39%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
45.4
PassMark G3D Mark
284
1,012
(+256.34%)
PassMark G2D Mark
53
152
(+186.79%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 520MXGeForce 930M
CodenameGF119GM108S
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Maxwell
Process Size40 nm28 nm
Transistors292 million1,020 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 520MXGeForce 930M
Memory Size1,024 MB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3DDR3
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s12.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz800 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit64 bit
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 520MXGeForce 930M
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)20 W33 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 520MXGeForce 930M
CUDA Cores48384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)1--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)824
Render Output Units (ROP)48
Core Clock Speed900 MHz549 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--549 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 520MXGeForce 930M
Pixel Fill Rate1.8 GPixel/s4.39 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate7.2 GTexel/s13.18 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance172.8 GFLOPS421.6 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance14.4 GFLOPS13.18 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 520MXGeForce 930M
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.7 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.