NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 445M
1,1481% of 104,598
GeForce MX350437% better
6,1666% of 104,598

The GeForce MX350 has 437% better performance than the GeForce GT 445M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 445M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 445M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 445M
Shop GeForce MX350
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2010. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF106) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GT 445M has 3 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 38.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 445M includes 144 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 590 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 445M has the 439th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107S) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX350 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX350 includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,354 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,468 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX350 has the 227th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 445MGeForce MX350
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermiPascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2010Q1 2020
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals
Display FPS for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
GeForce GT 445MGeForce MX350
Low - 1080p
--
26 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
14 FPS
High - 1080p
--
13 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 445M orGeForce MX350
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile20.8+63%
Radeon RX 560X Mobile20.3+59%
Radeon 660M15.3+20%
GeForce MX35012.8

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 445M orGeForce MX350
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 445M
1,1481% of 104,598
GeForce MX350437% better
6,1666% of 104,598

The GeForce MX350 has 437% better performance than the GeForce GT 445M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 445M is ranked 439th with a score of 1,148, and the GeForce MX350 is ranked 227th with a score of 6,166.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 445M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 445M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 445M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon 660M6,743+487%
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)6,736+487%
GeForce MX3506,166+437%
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)6,071+429%
GeForce GTX 680M5,897.5+414%
Radeon R5 M2301,175+2%
Radeon HD 6750M1,158.5+1%
GeForce GT 445M1,148
GeForce GT 555M1,146-0%
Quadro K610M1,143.5-0%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 445M orGeForce MX350
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 445MGeForce MX350
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,335.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,491
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
24,744
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
4,371
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
17,916
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,291
6,376
(+393.88%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
110
PassMark G3D Mark
811
2,805
(+245.87%)
PassMark G2D Mark
206
238
(+15.53%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 445MGeForce MX350
CodenameGF106GP107S
ArchitectureFermiPascal
Process Size40 nm14 nm
Transistors1,170 million3,300 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 445MGeForce MX350
Memory Size3 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth38.4 Gb/s56.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock800 MHz1,752 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit64 bit
L1 Cache64 KB48 KB
L2 Cache384 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 445MGeForce MX350
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W20 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 445MGeForce MX350
CUDA Cores144640
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)35
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2432
Render Output Units (ROP)2416
Core Clock Speed590 MHz1,354 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,468 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 445MGeForce MX350
Pixel Fill Rate3.54 GPixel/s23.49 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate14.16 GTexel/s46.98 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance339.8 GFLOPS1.88 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance28.32 GFLOPS58.72 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 445MGeForce MX350
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.