NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 435M
7991% of 104,598
RTX A2000 Mobile2,160% better
18,05817% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 2,160% better performance than the GeForce GT 435M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 435M
No data available
RTX A2000 Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 435M and the RTX A2000 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 435M
Shop RTX A2000 Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF106) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GT 435M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 435M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 650 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 435M has the 480th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.76% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2021. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA106) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A2000 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,215 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,687 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 120th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 435MRTX A2000 Mobile
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermiAmpere
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011Q2 2021
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (4.0)
The Witcher 3 (4.0)
Display FPS for Need for Speed Unbound
NFS Unbound
Display FPS for The Callisto Protocol
The Callisto Protocol
Display FPS for Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Spider-man: Miles Morales
Display FPS for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)
Display FPS for UNCHARTED: Legacy of Thieves Collection
UNCHARTED: Legacy of Thieves Collection
Display FPS for A Plague Tale: Requiem
A Plague Tale: Requiem

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (4.0)
The Witcher 3 (4.0)
GeForce GT 435MRTX A2000 Mobile
Low - 1080p
--
123 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
107 FPS
High - 1080p
--
86 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
67 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 435M orRTX A2000 Mobile

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 435M orRTX A2000 Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 435M
7991% of 104,598
RTX A2000 Mobile2,160% better
18,05817% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 2,160% better performance than the GeForce GT 435M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 435M is ranked 480th with a score of 799, and the RTX A2000 Mobile is ranked 120th with a score of 18,058.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 435M
No data available
RTX A2000 Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 435M and the RTX A2000 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 435M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 435M orRTX A2000 Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 435MRTX A2000 Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
5,016
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
5,523
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
60,336
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
13,157
3DMark 11 Performance Score
896.5
17,348
(+1,835.08%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
311
PassMark G3D Mark
536
9,942
(+1,754.85%)
PassMark G2D Mark
177
480
(+171.19%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 435MRTX A2000 Mobile
CodenameGF106GA106
ArchitectureFermiAmpere
Process Size40 nm8 nm
Transistors1,170 million12,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 435MRTX A2000 Mobile
Memory Size1,024 MB4 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth25.6 Gb/s192 Gb/s
Memory Clock800 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 435MRTX A2000 Mobile
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W95 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 435MRTX A2000 Mobile
CUDA Cores962,560
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)220
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1680
Render Output Units (ROP)1648
Tensor Cores--80
Ray Tracing Cores--20
Core Clock Speed650 MHz1,215 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,687 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 435MRTX A2000 Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate2.36 GPixel/s80.98 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate9.44 GTexel/s135 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance226.6 GFLOPS8.64 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance18.88 GFLOPS135 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 435MRTX A2000 Mobile
DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.