Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GT 435M
7991% of 104,598
Radeon RX 76005,336% better
43,43042% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 7600 has 5,336% better performance than the GeForce GT 435M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 435M
No data available
Radeon RX 7600
161.45Best Value
The Radeon RX 7600 has the best value for the money for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop GeForce GT 435M
Shop Radeon RX 7600
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF106) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The GT 435M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GT 435M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 650 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GT 435M has the 480th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.76% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon RX 7600 GPU
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2023 with a MSRP of $269. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 33) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Memory
The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 7600 includes 2,048 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,720 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,655 MHz. It usually operates at 2,250 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 64 AI accelerators optimized for AI workloads and 32 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RX 7600 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 2.1 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 165 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RX 7600 has the 31st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 41.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 43,430 score and $269 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 161.45. This is the best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GT 435M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Fermi | RDNA 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2011 | Q2 2023 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $269 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 24
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Ghost of Tsushima
Dragon's Dogma 2
Horizon Forbidden West
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Sons of the Forest
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | GeForce GT 435M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 339 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 285 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 210 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 46 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 14 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 8 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 435M orRadeon RX 7600
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6800 | 20.6 | +151% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 17 | +107% |
| Arc A750 | 16.8 | +105% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 13.9 | +70% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 9.5 | +16% |
| Radeon RX 7600 | 8.2 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 435M orRadeon RX 7600
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 17.97 | -45% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 21.24 | -35% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 28.11 | -14% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 28.71 | -12% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 29.35 | -11% |
| Radeon RX 7600 | 32.8 | |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 34.63 | +6% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 36.39 | +11% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 37.01 | +13% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GT 435M
7991% of 104,598
Radeon RX 76005,336% better
43,43042% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 7600 has 5,336% better performance than the GeForce GT 435M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GT 435M is ranked 480th with a score of 799, and the Radeon RX 7600 is ranked 31st with a score of 43,430.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 435M
No data available
Radeon RX 7600
161.45Best Value
The Radeon RX 7600 has the best value for the money for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Radeon RX 7600's 161.45 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 435M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 47,803 | +5,883% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47,166 | +5,803% |
| Radeon RX 7600 | 43,430 | +5,336% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 43,112 | +5,296% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 43,005 | +5,282% |
| FirePro M2000 | 841 | +5% |
| Radeon HD 7570M | 829 | +4% |
| GeForce GT 435M | 799 | |
| GeForce GT 525M | 799 | 0% |
| Radeon HD 7550M | 756 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 435M orRadeon RX 7600
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7600 | 161.45 | |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 131.48 | -19% |
| Arc A750 | 129.02 | -20% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 127.73 | -21% |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 127.71 | -21% |
| Arc A770 | 125.54 | -22% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 119.81 | -26% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 114.15 | -29% |
| Radeon RX 5600 XT | 112.22 | -30% |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 103.04 | -36% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GT 435M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 11,062 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 11,682 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 183,336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 32,404 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 128,948 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 896.5 | 38,744 (+4,221.7%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 536 | 16,465 (+2,971.83%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 177 | 957 (+440.68%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GT 435M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GF106 | Navi 33 |
| Architecture | Fermi | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 1,170 million | 13,300 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GT 435M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 25.6 Gb/s | 288 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 800 MHz | 2,250 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GT 435M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 W | 165 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 2.1 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GT 435M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 2,048 |
| CUDA Cores | 96 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 32 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 2 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 16 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 64 |
| AI Accelerators | -- | 64 |
| Ray Accelerators | -- | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 650 MHz | 1,720 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 2,655 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Game) | -- | 2,250 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GT 435M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 2.36 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 9.44 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 226.6 GFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 18.88 GFLOPS | 679.7 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GT 435M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.