NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 425M
7531% of 104,598
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile2,540% better
19,878.519% of 104,598

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile has 2,540% better performance than the GeForce GT 425M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 425M
No data available
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 425M and the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 425M
Shop Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2010. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF108) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GT 425M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 425M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 560 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 23 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 425M has the 484th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.72% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU106) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 3000 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 336 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 3000 Mobile includes 1,920 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 945 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,380 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 120 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 240 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 30 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 3000 Mobile has the 114th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 19.00% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 425MQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermiTuring
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2010Q2 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 2019
F1 2019
Display FPS for Total War: Three Kingdoms
Total War: Three Kingdoms
Display FPS for Far Cry New Dawn
Far Cry New Dawn
Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Display FPS for Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 2019
F1 2019
GeForce GT 425MQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Low - 720p
--
102 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
92 FPS
High - 1080p
--
84 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
73 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 425M orQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 425M orQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 425M
7531% of 104,598
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile2,540% better
19,878.519% of 104,598

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile has 2,540% better performance than the GeForce GT 425M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 425M is ranked 484th with a score of 753, and the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is ranked 114th with a score of 19,878.5.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 425M
No data available
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 425M and the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 425M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 425M orQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 425MQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
5,589
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
5,923
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
91,394
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
14,841.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
832
17,864
(+2,047.12%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
204
PassMark G3D Mark
522
11,079
(+2,022.41%)
PassMark G2D Mark
173
510
(+194.8%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 425MQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
CodenameGF108TU106
ArchitectureFermiTuring
Process Size40 nm12 nm
Transistors585 million10,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 425MQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Memory Size1,024 MB6 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth25.6 Gb/s336 Gb/s
Memory Clock800 MHz1,750 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit192 bit
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB3 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 425MQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)23 W80 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 425MQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
CUDA Cores961,920
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)230
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)16120
Render Output Units (ROP)464
Tensor Cores--240
Ray Tracing Cores--30
Core Clock Speed560 MHz945 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,380 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 425MQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate2.24 GPixel/s88.32 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate8.96 GTexel/s165.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance215 GFLOPS5.3 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance17.92 GFLOPS165.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 425MQuadro RTX 3000 Mobile
DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.