NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

VS
Performance
GeForce GT 415M
3790% of 104,598
Radeon R7 M260401% better
1,8972% of 104,598

The Radeon R7 M260 has 401% better performance than the GeForce GT 415M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 415M
No data available
Radeon R7 M260
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 415M and the Radeon R7 M260 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GT 415M
Shop Radeon R7 M260
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2010. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF108) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GT 415M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 415M includes 48 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 500 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 12 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 415M has the 532nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.36% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R7 M260 GPU

The AMD Radeon R7 M260 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2014. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Topaz) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R7 M260 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R7 M260 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 940 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 980 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R7 M260 has the 368th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GT 415MRadeon R7 M260
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureFermiGCN 3.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2010Q2 2014
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
GeForce GT 415MRadeon R7 M260
Low - 720p
--
18 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
13 FPS
High - 1080p
--
4 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
3 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 415M orRadeon R7 M260
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GT 740M4+25%
GeForce 920M4+25%
Radeon R7 M3403.9+22%
Quadro K1100M3.7+16%
Radeon R5 M2553.4+6%
Radeon R7 M2603.2
Radeon R5 M3352.9-9%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 415M orRadeon R7 M260
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GT 415M
3790% of 104,598
Radeon R7 M260401% better
1,8972% of 104,598

The Radeon R7 M260 has 401% better performance than the GeForce GT 415M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GT 415M is ranked 532nd with a score of 379, and the Radeon R7 M260 is ranked 368th with a score of 1,897.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GT 415M
No data available
Radeon R7 M260
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GT 415M and the Radeon R7 M260 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 415M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 8770M1,934+410%
Radeon R7 M260X1,903+402%
Radeon R7 M2601,897+401%
Radeon R7 M2651,882+397%
Radeon R7 M2701,857.5+390%
Radeon HD 6450M443+17%
GeForce 410M415+9%
GeForce GT 415M379

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GT 415M orRadeon R7 M260
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GT 415MRadeon R7 M260
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
5,603
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
1,067
3DMark 11 Performance Score
433
1,942.5
(+348.61%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
33.8
PassMark G3D Mark
286
498
(+74.13%)
PassMark G2D Mark
220
(+83.33%)
120
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
14.2
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
11.3
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GT 415MRadeon R7 M260
CodenameGF108Topaz
ArchitectureFermiGCN 3.0
Process Size40 nm28 nm
Transistors585 million1,550 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GT 415MRadeon R7 M260
Memory Size1,024 MB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3DDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock800 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GT 415MRadeon R7 M260
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)12 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GT 415MRadeon R7 M260
Stream Processors (SP)--384
CUDA Cores48--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)1--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)824
Render Output Units (ROP)48
Core Clock Speed500 MHz940 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--980 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GT 415MRadeon R7 M260
Pixel Fill Rate1 GPixel/s7.84 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate4 GTexel/s23.52 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance96 GFLOPS752.6 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance8 GFLOPS47.04 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GT 415MRadeon R7 M260
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL1.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.