NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 239% better performance than the GeForce 940MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 940MX and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce 940MX is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in 2016. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM108) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The 940MX has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 40.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 940MX includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 954 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 993 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 23 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 940MX has the 321st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.44% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce 940MX | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | 2016 | Q2 2015 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 2020 | GeForce 940MX | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 48 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 23 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 18 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 11 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 950M | 18.5 | +65% |
| GeForce MX150 | 16 | +43% |
| GeForce MX330 | 16 | +43% |
| GeForce MX250 | 16 | +43% |
| GeForce MX130 | 12.6 | +13% |
| GeForce 940MX | 11.2 | |
| GeForce 930MX | 9.74 | -13% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 239% better performance than the GeForce 940MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce 940MX is ranked 321st with a score of 2,556, and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 940MX and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 M295X | 8,850.5 | +246% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | 8,752 | +242% |
| Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | 8,656 | +239% |
| GeForce GTX 880M | 8,578 | +236% |
| Radeon RX 560 Mobile | 8,329 | +226% |
| Quadro M520 | 2,658 | +4% |
| Radeon R9 M265X | 2,633 | +3% |
| GeForce 940MX | 2,556 | |
| GeForce GT 750M | 2,543 | -1% |
| Radeon R7 M370 | 2,524 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce 940MX | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 626 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 710 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 11,513 | 38,490 (+234.32%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,996 | 6,819 (+241.63%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 2,660.5 | 8,305 (+212.16%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 64.5 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,516 | 4,911 (+223.94%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 172 | 718 (+317.44%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 25.2 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 22 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce 940MX | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GM108 | Amethyst |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 1,020 million | 5,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce 940MX | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 40.1 Gb/s | 174.7 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,253 MHz | 1,365 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce 940MX | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 W | 250 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce 940MX | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 1,792 |
| CUDA Cores | 384 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 28 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 112 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 954 MHz | 834 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 993 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce 940MX | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 7.94 GPixel/s | 26.69 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 23.83 GTexel/s | 93.41 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 762.6 GFLOPS | 2.99 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 23.83 GFLOPS | 373.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce 940MX | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (5.1) | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.