NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD FirePro W4170M

VS
Performance
GeForce 920MX
1,8352% of 104,598
FirePro W4170M26% better
2,3152% of 104,598

The FirePro W4170M has 26% better performance than the GeForce 920MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 920MX
No data available
FirePro W4170M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 920MX and the FirePro W4170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce 920MX
Shop FirePro W4170M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 920MX is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2016. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM108S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 920MX has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 920MX includes 256 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 965 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 993 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 16 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 920MX has the 373rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.75% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD FirePro W4170M GPU

The AMD FirePro W4170M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Mars) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The FirePro W4170M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FirePro W4170M includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 825 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The FirePro W4170M has the 342nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce 920MXFirePro W4170M
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureMaxwellGCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2016Q2 2014
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Origins
Assassin´s Creed Origins
Display FPS for Destiny 2
Destiny 2
Display FPS for Fortnite
Fortnite
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Kingdom Come: Deliverance
GeForce 920MXFirePro W4170M
Low - 720p
24 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
10 FPS
--
High - 1080p
8 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
6 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920MX orFirePro W4170M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX1308.1+37%
GeForce 940MX8+36%
GeForce 940M7.5+27%
GeForce MX2307+19%
Radeon RX 540 Mobile7+19%
GeForce 920MX5.9
GeForce MX1105.9+0%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920MX orFirePro W4170M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce 920MX
1,8352% of 104,598
FirePro W4170M26% better
2,3152% of 104,598

The FirePro W4170M has 26% better performance than the GeForce 920MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce 920MX is ranked 373rd with a score of 1,835, and the FirePro W4170M is ranked 342nd with a score of 2,315.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 920MX
No data available
FirePro W4170M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 920MX and the FirePro W4170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920MX or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce 840M2,340+28%
Radeon 5302,327+27%
FirePro W4170M2,315+26%
GeForce GT 745M2,249+23%
Radeon R7 M4402,245+22%
GeForce GT 740M1,848+1%
GeForce GT 645M1,844.5+1%
GeForce 920MX1,835
Quadro K1100M1,826.5-0%
GeForce GTX 560M1,820-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920MX orFirePro W4170M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce 920MXFirePro W4170M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
417
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
472
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
9,113.5
12,506
(+37.22%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,448
1,766
(+21.96%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,983
2,629
(+32.58%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
47.7
54.7
(+14.68%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,081
(+4.65%)
1,033
PassMark G2D Mark
151
212
(+40.4%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
21.2
22.4
(+5.66%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
20.3
(+15.34%)
17.6
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro W4170M
CodenameGM108SMars
ArchitectureMaxwellGCN 1.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,020 million950 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro W4170M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s64 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,000 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro W4170M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)16 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro W4170M
Stream Processors (SP)--384
CUDA Cores256--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2424
Render Output Units (ROP)88
Core Clock Speed965 MHz825 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)993 MHz900 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro W4170M
Pixel Fill Rate7.94 GPixel/s7.2 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate23.83 GTexel/s21.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance508.4 GFLOPS691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance15.89 GFLOPS43.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro W4170M
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.