NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD FirePro M2000

VS
Performance
GeForce 920MX118% better
1,8352% of 104,598
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598

The GeForce 920MX has 118% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 920MX
No data available
FirePro M2000
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 920MX and the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce 920MX
Shop FirePro M2000
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 920MX is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2016. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM108S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 920MX has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 920MX includes 256 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 965 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 993 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 16 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 920MX has the 373rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.75% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD FirePro M2000 GPU

The AMD FirePro M2000 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2012. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Turks) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The FirePro M2000 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FirePro M2000 includes 480 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 500 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The FirePro M2000 has the 478th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce 920MXFirePro M2000
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureMaxwellTeraScale 2
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2016Q3 2012
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Origins
Assassin´s Creed Origins
Display FPS for Destiny 2
Destiny 2
Display FPS for Fortnite
Fortnite
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Kingdom Come: Deliverance
GeForce 920MXFirePro M2000
Low - 720p
24 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
10 FPS
--
High - 1080p
8 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
6 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920MX orFirePro M2000
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX1308.1+37%
GeForce 940MX8+36%
GeForce 940M7.5+27%
GeForce MX2307+19%
Radeon RX 540 Mobile7+19%
GeForce 920MX5.9
GeForce MX1105.9+0%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920MX orFirePro M2000
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce 920MX118% better
1,8352% of 104,598
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598

The GeForce 920MX has 118% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce 920MX is ranked 373rd with a score of 1,835, and the FirePro M2000 is ranked 478th with a score of 841.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 920MX
No data available
FirePro M2000
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 920MX and the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920MX or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GT 740M1,848+1%
GeForce GT 645M1,844.5+1%
GeForce 920MX1,835
Quadro K1100M1,826.5-0%
GeForce GTX 560M1,820-1%
Radeon HD 6630M877-52%
Mobility Radeon HD 5650855.5-53%
FirePro M2000841-54%
Radeon HD 7570M829-55%
GeForce GT 435M799-56%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920MX orFirePro M2000
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce 920MXFirePro M2000
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
417
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
472
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
9,113.5
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,448
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,983
(+107.86%)
954
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
47.7
--
PassMark G3D Mark
1,081
(+154.35%)
425
PassMark G2D Mark
151
206
(+36.42%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
21.2
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
20.3
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro M2000
CodenameGM108STurks
ArchitectureMaxwellTeraScale 2
Process Size28 nm40 nm
Transistors1,020 million716 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro M2000
Memory Size2 GB1,024 MB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s25.6 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz800 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit64 bit
L1 Cache64 KB--
L2 Cache1,024 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro M2000
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)16 W33 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro M2000
Stream Processors (SP)--480
CUDA Cores256--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2424
Render Output Units (ROP)88
Core Clock Speed965 MHz500 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)993 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro M2000
Pixel Fill Rate7.94 GPixel/s4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate23.83 GTexel/s12 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance508.4 GFLOPS480 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance15.89 GFLOPS--

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce 920MXFirePro M2000
DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL3.01.2
OpenGL4.64.4
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)5.0

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.