NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

VS
Performance
GeForce 920M
1,718.52% of 104,598
Radeon Pro Vega 16515% better
10,56910% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 515% better performance than the GeForce 920M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 920M
No data available
Radeon Pro Vega 16
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 920M and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce 920M
Shop Radeon Pro Vega 16
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce 920M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 920M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2015. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208B) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 920M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 920M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 954 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 954 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 920M has the 391st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2018. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 12) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro Vega 16 has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 307.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro Vega 16 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 815 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,190 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro Vega 16 has the 174th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce 920MRadeon Pro Vega 16
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKepler 2.0GCN 5.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2015Q4 2018
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Total War: Three Kingdoms
Total War: Three Kingdoms
Display FPS for Dirt Rally 2.0
Dirt Rally 2.0
Display FPS for Far Cry New Dawn
Far Cry New Dawn
Display FPS for Metro Exodus
Metro Exodus
Display FPS for Just Cause 4
Just Cause 4
Display FPS for Darksiders III
Darksiders III

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 2020
F1 2020
GeForce 920MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Low - 720p
16 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920M orRadeon Pro Vega 16
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX13052+219%
GeForce 940MX48.3+196%
GeForce 930MX43.1+164%
Radeon R5 M25533+102%
GeForce MX11033+102%
GeForce 920M16.3

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920M orRadeon Pro Vega 16
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce 920M
1,718.52% of 104,598
Radeon Pro Vega 16515% better
10,56910% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 515% better performance than the GeForce 920M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce 920M is ranked 391st with a score of 1,718.5, and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 is ranked 174th with a score of 10,569.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 920M
No data available
Radeon Pro Vega 16
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 920M and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+530%
Arc A350M10,730+524%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+515%
T600 Mobile10,498+511%
Radeon 680M10,371+503%
FirePro M41001,728+1%
GeForce GT 730M1,722+0%
GeForce 920M1,718.5
GeForce GT 735M1,713-0%
Radeon HD 8750M1,698-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 920M orRadeon Pro Vega 16
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce 920MRadeon Pro Vega 16
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
329
2,198
(+568.09%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
363
2,443
(+573%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
7,242
56,273
(+677.04%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,161.5
7,745
(+566.81%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,822
10,926
(+499.67%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
44.3
130.2
(+193.91%)
PassMark G3D Mark
721
4,809
(+566.99%)
PassMark G2D Mark
117
580
(+395.73%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce 920MRadeon Pro Vega 16
CodenameGK208BVega 12
ArchitectureKepler 2.0GCN 5.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors1,020 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce 920MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeDDR3HBM2
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s307.2 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,200 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit1,024 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce 920MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)33 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce 920MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Stream Processors (SP)--1,024
CUDA Cores384--
Compute Units (CU)--16
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3264
Render Output Units (ROP)832
Core Clock Speed954 MHz815 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)954 MHz1,190 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce 920MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Pixel Fill Rate7.63 GPixel/s38.08 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate30.53 GTexel/s76.16 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance732.7 GFLOPS2.44 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance30.53 GFLOPS152.3 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce 920MRadeon Pro Vega 16
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.0

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.