Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce 910M
1,4131% of 104,598
Iris Pro Graphics 520036% better
1,9232% of 104,598
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 36% better performance than the GeForce 910M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce 910M
No data available
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 910M and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop GeForce 910M
Shop Iris Pro Graphics 5200
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce 910M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce 910M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2015. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208B) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The 910M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 1,001 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 16.02 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 910M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 641 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 641 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 910M has the 415th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.35% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 GPU
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Generation 7.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Haswell GT3e) and is manufactured on a 22 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 includes 320 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 200 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,150 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 45 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has the 366th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce 910M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | Intel |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q1 2015 | Q2 2013 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Rise of the Tomb Raider
BioShock Infinite
CS: GO
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | GeForce 910M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | 15 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 768p | 9 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 6 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 4 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 910M orIris Pro Graphics 5200
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GT 740M | 6.4 | +83% |
| Radeon R7 M360 | 4.1 | +17% |
| Radeon R5 M330 | 3.9 | +11% |
| GeForce 920M | 3.7 | +6% |
| GeForce 910M | 3.5 | |
| Radeon R7 M440 | 3.5 | +0% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 910M orIris Pro Graphics 5200
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce 910M
1,4131% of 104,598
Iris Pro Graphics 520036% better
1,9232% of 104,598
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 36% better performance than the GeForce 910M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce 910M is ranked 415th with a score of 1,413, and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is ranked 366th with a score of 1,923.
Performance per dollar
GeForce 910M
No data available
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 910M and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 910M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R6 M255DX | 2,198 | +56% |
| UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake, 32EU) | 2,127 | +51% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | 1,923 | +36% |
| Radeon R7 (Carrizo) | 1,792 | +27% |
| UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2, 64EU) | 1,791.5 | +27% |
| Radeon HD 7730M | 1,478 | +5% |
| Radeon HD 6850M | 1,469.5 | +4% |
| GeForce 910M | 1,413 | |
| Radeon HD 8670M | 1,396 | -1% |
| Radeon HD 8730M | 1,370.5 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 910M orIris Pro Graphics 5200
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce 910M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 6,636 | 11,930 (+79.78%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,022 | 1,380.5 (+35.08%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,432 | 2,217 (+54.82%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 24 | 52.3 (+117.92%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 601 | 1,202 (+100%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 129 | 405 (+213.95%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 14.4 | 20.8 (+44.44%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 13.3 | 21.9 (+64.66%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce 910M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK208B | Haswell GT3e |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Transistors | 1,020 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce 910M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | System Shared |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 16.02 Gb/s | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | 1,001 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | System Shared |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce 910M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 W | 45 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce 910M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | -- | 320 |
| CUDA Cores | 384 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 2 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 32 | 40 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 4 |
| Core Clock Speed | 641 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 641 MHz | 1,150 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce 910M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 5.13 GPixel/s | 4.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 20.51 GTexel/s | 46 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 492.3 GFLOPS | 736 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 20.51 GFLOPS | 184 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce 910M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 5.1 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.