NVIDIA GeForce 840M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

VS
Performance
GeForce 840M
2,3402% of 104,598
GeForce MX15092% better
4,4944% of 104,598

The GeForce MX150 has 92% better performance than the GeForce 840M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 840M
No data available
GeForce MX150
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 840M and the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce 840M
Shop GeForce MX150
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce 840M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 840M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM108S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 840M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 1,001 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 16.02 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 840M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,029 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,124 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 840M has the 340th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.24% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX150 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2017. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX150 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX150 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,469 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,532 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX150 has the 262nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce 840MGeForce MX150
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureMaxwellPascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2017
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Display FPS for Ghostwire: Tokyo
Ghostwire: Tokyo
Display FPS for ELEX 2
ELEX 2
Display FPS for Elden Ring
Elden Ring

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
GeForce 840MGeForce MX150
Low - 1080p
--
--
Medium - 1080p
--
15 FPS
High - 1080p
--
9 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
7 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 840M orGeForce MX150
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile38.2+474%
GeForce MX1506.66

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 840M orGeForce MX150
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce 840M
2,3402% of 104,598
GeForce MX15092% better
4,4944% of 104,598

The GeForce MX150 has 92% better performance than the GeForce 840M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce 840M is ranked 340th with a score of 2,340, and the GeForce MX150 is ranked 262nd with a score of 4,494.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 840M
No data available
GeForce MX150
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 840M and the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 840M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon RX 550 Mobile4,559+95%
Radeon Pro 4504,502+92%
GeForce MX1504,494+92%
GeForce GTX 850M4,385.5+87%
GeForce GTX 950M4,367+87%
FirePro W4190M2,351+0%
Radeon HD 8850M2,349+0%
GeForce 840M2,340
Radeon 5302,327-1%
FirePro W4170M2,315-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 840M orGeForce MX150
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce 840MGeForce MX150
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,046
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,132.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
8,723.5
19,132
(+119.32%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,573
3,488
(+121.74%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,378
4,576
(+92.43%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
55.9
94.1
(+68.34%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,091
2,273
(+108.34%)
PassMark G2D Mark
149
216
(+44.97%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
22.5
41.8
(+85.78%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce 840MGeForce MX150
CodenameGM108SGP108
ArchitectureMaxwellPascal
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors1,020 million1,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce 840MGeForce MX150
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth16.02 Gb/s48.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,001 MHz1,502 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit64 bit
L1 Cache64 KB48 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce 840MGeForce MX150
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)33 W25 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce 840MGeForce MX150
CUDA Cores384384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--3
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1624
Render Output Units (ROP)816
Core Clock Speed1,029 MHz1,469 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,124 MHz1,532 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce 840MGeForce MX150
Pixel Fill Rate8.99 GPixel/s24.51 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate17.98 GTexel/s36.77 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance863.2 GFLOPS1,177 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance26.98 GFLOPS36.77 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce 840MGeForce MX150
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.