Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce 825M
1,756.52% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER3,793% better
68,37365% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 3,793% better performance than the GeForce 825M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce 825M
No data available
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
114.1571% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 71% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop GeForce 825M
Shop GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce 825M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce 825M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The 825M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 825M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 941 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 825M has the 382nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2024 with a MSRP of $599. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD104) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, with a 1,313 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 504.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4070 SUPER includes 7,168 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,980 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,475 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 80 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 224 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 56 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 4070 SUPER occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 550 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 220 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 4070 SUPER has the 11th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 65.37% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 68,373 score and $599 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 114.15. This is the 11th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce 825M | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2014 | Q1 2024 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $599 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (2023)
Alan Wake 2
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Baldur's Gate 3
F1 23
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora | GeForce 825M | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 137 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 126 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 99 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 65 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 34 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M orGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 49 | +44% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 47 | +38% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 46 | +35% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 39.8 | +17% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 39 | +15% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 34 | |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 34 | +0% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 31 | -9% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (12 GB) | 30 | -12% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 29 | -15% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M orGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 17.21 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 17.62 | |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 19.52 | +11% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 20.08 | +14% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 20.39 | +16% |
| Arc A770 | 20.56 | +17% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 21.7 | +23% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 21.72 | +23% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 22.17 | +26% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce 825M
1,756.52% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER3,793% better
68,37365% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 3,793% better performance than the GeForce 825M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce 825M is ranked 382nd with a score of 1,756.5, and the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is ranked 11th with a score of 68,373.
Performance per dollar
GeForce 825M
No data available
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
114.1571% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 174% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 114.15 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 72,227.5 | +4,012% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 69,481 | +3,856% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 68,373 | +3,793% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 65,610.5 | +3,635% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 61,518 | +3,402% |
| Radeon R5 M335 | 1,784 | +2% |
| Radeon R5 M255 | 1,784 | +2% |
| GeForce 825M | 1,756.5 | |
| GeForce GT 640M | 1,728 | -2% |
| FirePro M4100 | 1,728 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M orGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Arc A750 | 129.02 | +13% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 127.73 | +12% |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 127.71 | +12% |
| Arc A770 | 125.54 | +10% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 119.81 | +5% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 114.15 | |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 103.04 | -10% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 100.12 | -12% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 95.14 | -17% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 95.09 | -17% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce 825M | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 20,992 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 21,186 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 7,416 | 171,098 (+2,207.15%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,150 | 48,876 (+4,150.09%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 198,556 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,859.5 | 51,339.5 (+2,660.93%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 49 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 782 | 29,997 (+3,735.93%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 250 | 1,143 (+357.2%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK208 | AD104 |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 1,020 million | 35,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 14.4 Gb/s | 504.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 900 MHz | 1,313 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 48 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 W | 220 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 550 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 16-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 384 | 7,168 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 2 | 56 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 32 | 224 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 224 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 56 |
| Core Clock Speed | 850 MHz | 1,980 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 941 MHz | 2,475 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 7.53 GPixel/s | 198 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 30.11 GTexel/s | 554.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 722.7 GFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 30.11 GFLOPS | 554.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.