Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce 825M
1,756.52% of 104,598
GeForce MX350251% better
6,1666% of 104,598
The GeForce MX350 has 251% better performance than the GeForce 825M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce 825M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 825M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop GeForce 825M
Shop GeForce MX350
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce 825M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce 825M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The 825M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 825M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 941 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 825M has the 382nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107S) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The MX350 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The MX350 includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,354 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,468 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The MX350 has the 227th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce 825M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2014 | Q1 2020 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Sons of the Forest
Ready or Not
The Finals
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
EA Sports WRC
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Total War: PHARAOH
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | GeForce 825M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 26 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 14 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 13 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M orGeForce MX350
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 20.8 | +63% |
| Radeon RX 560X Mobile | 20.3 | +59% |
| Radeon 660M | 15.3 | +20% |
| GeForce MX350 | 12.8 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M orGeForce MX350
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce 825M
1,756.52% of 104,598
GeForce MX350251% better
6,1666% of 104,598
The GeForce MX350 has 251% better performance than the GeForce 825M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce 825M is ranked 382nd with a score of 1,756.5, and the GeForce MX350 is ranked 227th with a score of 6,166.
Performance per dollar
GeForce 825M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 825M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon 660M | 6,743 | +284% |
| GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) | 6,736 | +283% |
| GeForce MX350 | 6,166 | +251% |
| GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) | 6,071 | +246% |
| GeForce GTX 680M | 5,897.5 | +236% |
| Radeon R5 M335 | 1,784 | +2% |
| Radeon R5 M255 | 1,784 | +2% |
| GeForce 825M | 1,756.5 | |
| GeForce GT 640M | 1,728 | -2% |
| FirePro M4100 | 1,728 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M orGeForce MX350
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce 825M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 1,335.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 1,491 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 7,416 | 24,744 (+233.66%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,150 | 4,371 (+280.09%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 17,916 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,859.5 | 6,376 (+242.89%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 49 | 110 (+124.49%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 782 | 2,805 (+258.7%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 250 (+5.04%) | 238 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK208 | GP107S |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 1,020 million | 3,300 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 14.4 Gb/s | 56.06 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 900 MHz | 1,752 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 W | 20 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 384 | 640 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 2 | 5 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 32 | 32 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 850 MHz | 1,354 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 941 MHz | 1,468 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 7.53 GPixel/s | 23.49 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 30.11 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 722.7 GFLOPS | 1.88 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 30.11 GFLOPS | 58.72 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.