NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

VS
Performance
GeForce 825M
1,756.52% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 480185% better
5,0145% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 480 has 185% better performance than the GeForce 825M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 825M
No data available
GeForce GTX 480
10.056% of 161.45

The GeForce GTX 480 has 6% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop GeForce 825M
Shop GeForce GTX 480
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce 825M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 825M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 825M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 825M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 941 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 825M has the 382nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q1 2010 with a MSRP of $499. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF100) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 480 has 1,536 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 924 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 177.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 480 includes 480 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 700 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 60 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GTX 480 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, mini-HDMI 1.3a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The GTX 480 has the 248th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.79% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 5,014 score and $499 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 10.05. This is the 101st best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce 825MGeForce GTX 480
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureKepler 2.0Fermi
Market SegmentMobileDesktop
Release DateQ1 2014Q1 2010
Launch Price (MSRP)--$499
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
GeForce 825MGeForce GTX 480
Low - 720p
69 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
38 FPS
--
High - 768p
31 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M orGeForce GTX 480

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M orGeForce GTX 480
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce 825M
1,756.52% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 480185% better
5,0145% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 480 has 185% better performance than the GeForce 825M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce 825M is ranked 382nd with a score of 1,756.5, and the GeForce GTX 480 is ranked 248th with a score of 5,014.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 825M
No data available
GeForce GTX 480
10.056% of 161.45

The GeForce GTX 480 has 15% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

GeForce GTX 480's 10.05 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition)6,194+253%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti5,378+206%
GeForce GTX 4805,014+185%
GeForce GT 10304,727.5+169%
GeForce GTX 4704,342+147%
Radeon R5 M3351,784+2%
Radeon R5 M2551,784+2%
GeForce 825M1,756.5
GeForce GT 640M1,728-2%
FirePro M41001,728-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 825M orGeForce GTX 480
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Radeon HD 687017.65+76%
Radeon HD 797014.15+41%
GeForce GTX 59013.11+31%
GeForce GTX 47012.44+24%
Radeon HD 645011.33+13%
GeForce GTX 48010.05

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce 825MGeForce GTX 480
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
7,416
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,150
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,859.5
4,982
(+167.92%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
49
--
PassMark G3D Mark
782
4,107
(+425.19%)
PassMark G2D Mark
250
450
(+80%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce 825MGeForce GTX 480
CodenameGK208GF100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0Fermi
Process Size28 nm40 nm
Transistors1,020 million3,100 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce 825MGeForce GTX 480
Memory Size1,024 MB1,536 MB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s177.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz924 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit384 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB768 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce 825MGeForce GTX 480
Slots--2 slots
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)33 W250 W
Suggested PSU--600 W
Power Connectors--1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
OutputsDevice DependentDVI, mini-HDMI 1.3a

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce 825MGeForce GTX 480
CUDA Cores384480
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)215
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3260
Render Output Units (ROP)848
Core Clock Speed850 MHz700 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)941 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce 825MGeForce GTX 480
Pixel Fill Rate7.53 GPixel/s21.03 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate30.11 GTexel/s42.06 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance722.7 GFLOPS1,345 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance30.11 GFLOPS168.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce 825MGeForce GTX 480
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.01.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)5.1

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.