NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon 820M
The Radeon 820M has 123% better performance than the GeForce 825M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 825M and the Radeon 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce 825M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce 825M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The 825M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 825M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 941 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 825M has the 411th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 572 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.35% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
About the AMD Radeon 820M GPU
The Radeon 820M is a graphics card by AMD. It is built on the RDNA 3+ GPU microarchitecture.
Memory
GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 820M includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. Additionally, the GPU features 2 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Benchmark Performance
The 820M has the 304th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 572 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.02% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce 825M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | RDNA 3+ |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2014 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Space Marine 2 | GeForce 825M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 8 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 6 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 6 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | 72 | +1,197% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | 71 | +1,179% |
| Radeon 820M | 5.55 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon 820M has 123% better performance than the GeForce 825M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce 825M is ranked 411th with a score of 1,756.5, and the Radeon 820M is ranked 304th with a score of 3,913.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 825M and the Radeon 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 765M | 4,019 | +129% |
| GeForce GTX 675MX | 3,978.5 | +127% |
| Radeon 820M | 3,913 | +123% |
| Quadro M620 | 3,801 | +116% |
| Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) | 3,637.5 | +107% |
| Radeon R5 M335 | 1,784 | +2% |
| Radeon R5 M255 | 1,784 | +2% |
| GeForce 825M | 1,756.5 | |
| GeForce GT 640M | 1,728 | -2% |
| FirePro M4100 | 1,728 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce 825M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 786 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 900 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 7,416 | 22,769 (+207.03%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,150 | 3,155 (+174.35%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,859.5 | 4,284 (+130.38%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 49 | 103.7 (+111.63%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 761 | 2,167 (+184.76%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 214 | 739 (+245.33%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK208 | -- |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Size | 28 nm | -- |
| Transistors | 1,020 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | -- |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | -- |
| Memory Bandwidth | 14.4 Gb/s | -- |
| Memory Clock | 900 MHz | 7,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | -- |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 W | -- |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 128 |
| CUDA Cores | 384 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 2 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 32 | -- |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | -- |
| Ray Accelerators | -- | 2 |
| Core Clock Speed | 850 MHz | -- |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 941 MHz | 2,900 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 7.53 GPixel/s | -- |
| Texture Fill Rate | 30.11 GTexel/s | -- |
| FP32 Performance | 722.7 GFLOPS | -- |
| FP64 Performance | 30.11 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce 825M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | -- |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | -- |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | -- |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.