PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

NVIDIA
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
GeForce 820M
1,266.51% of 104,737
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile2,289% better
30,26229% of 104,737

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 2,289% better performance than the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 820M
No data available
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 820M and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce 820M
Shop RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce 820M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 820M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2013. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF117B) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 820M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 820M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 625 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 820M has the 425th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD107) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile includes 3,072 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,635 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,115 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 24 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has the 74th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce 820MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Ada Lovelace
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2013Q1 2023
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
GeForce 820MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Low - 720p
56 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
31 FPS
--
High - 768p
26 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
8 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 820M orRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 820M orRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce 820M
1,266.51% of 104,737
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile2,289% better
30,26229% of 104,737

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 2,289% better performance than the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce 820M is ranked 425th with a score of 1,266.5, and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is ranked 74th with a score of 30,262.

Performance per dollar
GeForce 820M
No data available
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce 820M and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 820M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce 820M orRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce 820MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
8,433
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
8,849
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6,073.5
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
897
22,039
(+2,356.97%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,383
27,558
(+1,892.62%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
35.6
295
(+728.65%)
PassMark G3D Mark
495
15,579
(+3,047.27%)
PassMark G2D Mark
112
602
(+437.5%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce 820MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
CodenameGF117BAD107
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Ada Lovelace
Process Size28 nm5 nm
Transistors585 million18,900 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce 820MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Memory Size2 GB8 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s256 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz2,000 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache128 KB12 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce 820MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce 820MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
CUDA Cores963,072
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)224
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1696
Render Output Units (ROP)848
Tensor Cores--96
Ray Tracing Cores--24
Core Clock Speed625 MHz1,635 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--2,115 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce 820MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate2.5 GPixel/s101.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate10 GTexel/s203 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance240 GFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance20 GFLOPS203 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce 820MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.