Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,598
GeForce MX25044% better
4,6334% of 104,598
The GeForce MX250 has 44% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
GeForce MX250
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the GeForce MX250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
Shop GeForce MX250
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) GPU
The Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in 2021. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tiger Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.
Memory
The UHD Graphics Xe has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The UHD Graphics Xe includes 256 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,350 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe has the 293rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce MX250 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2019. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108B) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The MX250 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The MX250 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 937 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,038 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The MX250 has the 259th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Mobile |
| Release Date | 2021 | Q1 2019 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Sons of the Forest
Ready or Not
The Finals
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
EA Sports WRC
Total War: PHARAOH
Assassin's Creed Mirage
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 20 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 11 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orGeForce MX250
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 22.2 | +107% |
| Radeon RX 560X Mobile | 21.5 | +101% |
| Radeon 660M | 16.7 | +56% |
| GeForce MX350 | 13.8 | +29% |
| GeForce MX250 | 10.7 | |
| Radeon RX 550 Mobile | 8.73 | -18% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orGeForce MX250
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,598
GeForce MX25044% better
4,6334% of 104,598
The GeForce MX250 has 44% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is ranked 293rd with a score of 3,222, and the GeForce MX250 is ranked 259th with a score of 4,633.
Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
GeForce MX250
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the GeForce MX250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 M280X | 4,698 | +46% |
| Radeon RX 540 Mobile | 4,646 | +44% |
| GeForce MX250 | 4,633 | +44% |
| Radeon RX 550 Mobile | 4,559 | +41% |
| Radeon Pro 450 | 4,502 | +40% |
| Radeon RX Vega 10 | 3,389 | +5% |
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | 3,225 | +0% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | 3,222 | |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | -0% |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | -6% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orGeForce MX250
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 676.5 | 1,103 (+63.05%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 784 | 1,220.5 (+55.68%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 15,662 | 21,545 (+37.56%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 2,495 | 3,660 (+46.69%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 11,380 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,691 | 4,850 (+31.4%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 83.5 | 99.6 (+19.28%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 2,412 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 239 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 43.6 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 43.7 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Tiger Lake GT1 | GP108B |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
| Process Size | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 48.06 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1,502 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 10 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 256 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 384 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 3 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 16 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,350 MHz | 1,038 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 10.8 GPixel/s | 16.61 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 21.6 GTexel/s | 24.91 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 691.2 GFLOPS | 797.2 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS | 24.91 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.