Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) has 8% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 645 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the Iris Plus Graphics 645 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) GPU
The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in 2021. Its Tiger Lake GT1 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.1 architecture and is fabricated on the 10 nm process.
This GPU is paired with System Shared of VRAM. Its System Shared memory clock and System Shared interface gives it a bandwidth of System Dependent. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) has the 290th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 GPU
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q4 2019. Its Coffee Lake GT3e chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 9.5 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.
This GPU is paired with System Shared of VRAM. Its System Shared memory clock and System Shared interface gives it a bandwidth of System Dependent. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 has the 299th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | 2021 | Q4 2019 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Benchmark Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) has 8% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 645 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is ranked 290th with a score of 3,222, and the Iris Plus Graphics 645 is ranked 299th with a score of 2,985.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the Iris Plus Graphics 645 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 770 | 3,481.5 | +8% |
| Radeon RX Vega 10 | 3,389 | +5% |
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | 3,225 | +0% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | 3,222 | |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | -0% |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | -6% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 2,985 | -7% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 2,894 | -10% |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 2,862.5 | -11% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | 2,766 | -14% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 676.5 (+23%) | 550 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 784 (+25.64%) | 624 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 15,662 | -- |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 2,495 (+31.8%) | 1,893 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 11,380 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,691 (+13.99%) | 3,238 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 83.5 (+24.44%) | 67.1 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 1,727 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 389 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Tiger Lake GT1 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Size | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 256 | 384 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 16 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,350 MHz | 1,050 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 10.8 GPixel/s | 6.3 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 21.6 GTexel/s | 50.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 691.2 GFLOPS | 806.4 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS | 201.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.