PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Intel
VS
AMD
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,737
Radeon RX Vega M GH344% better
14,30214% of 104,737

The Radeon RX Vega M GH has 344% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
Radeon RX Vega M GH
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the Radeon RX Vega M GH for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
Shop Radeon RX Vega M GH
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) GPU

The Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in 2021. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tiger Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Memory

The UHD Graphics Xe has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The UHD Graphics Xe includes 256 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,350 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The UHD Graphics Xe has the 293rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH GPU

The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 22) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The RX Vega M GH has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 204.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX Vega M GH includes 1,536 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,063 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,190 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RX Vega M GH has the 150th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 13.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon RX Vega M GH
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1GCN 4.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release Date2021Q1 2018
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Display FPS for Forza Horizon 5
Forza Horizon 5
Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon RX Vega M GH
Low - 1080p
--
39 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
30 FPS
High - 1080p
--
23 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
23 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
4 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon RX Vega M GH
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon 780M15.8+295%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)6.7+68%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)6.06+51%
Radeon RX Vega M GH4

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon RX Vega M GH
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,737
Radeon RX Vega M GH344% better
14,30214% of 104,737

The Radeon RX Vega M GH has 344% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is ranked 293rd with a score of 3,222, and the Radeon RX Vega M GH is ranked 150th with a score of 14,302.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
Radeon RX Vega M GH
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the Radeon RX Vega M GH for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon RX Vega M GH
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon RX Vega M GH
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
676.5
2,908
(+329.86%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
784
2,999
(+282.53%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15,662
59,162
(+277.74%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,495
10,248
(+310.74%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
11,380
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,691
13,212
(+257.95%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
83.5
144
(+72.46%)
PassMark G3D Mark
--
6,573
PassMark G2D Mark
--
778
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon RX Vega M GH
CodenameTiger Lake GT1Polaris 22
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1GCN 4.0
Process Size10 nm14 nm
Transistors--5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon RX Vega M GH
Memory SizeSystem Shared4 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedHBM2
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent204.8 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared1,024 bit
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache--1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon RX Vega M GH
Bus InterfaceRing BusIGP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W100 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon RX Vega M GH
Stream Processors (SP)--1,536
Shading Units256--
Compute Units (CU)--24
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1696
Render Output Units (ROP)864
Core Clock Speed350 MHz1,063 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,350 MHz1,190 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon RX Vega M GH
Pixel Fill Rate10.8 GPixel/s76.16 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate21.6 GTexel/s114.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance691.2 GFLOPS3.66 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance172.8 GFLOPS228.5 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon RX Vega M GH
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.