Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,598
Radeon R9 FURY444% better
17,54317% of 104,598
The Radeon R9 FURY has 444% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
Radeon R9 FURY
31.9520% of 161.45
The Radeon R9 FURY has 20% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
Shop Radeon R9 FURY
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) GPU
The Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in 2021. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tiger Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.
Memory
The UHD Graphics Xe has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The UHD Graphics Xe includes 256 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,350 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe has the 293rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R9 FURY GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 FURY is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $549. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 FURY has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 FURY includes 3,584 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R9 FURY occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 275 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R9 FURY has the 128th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,543 score and $549 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 31.95. This is the 78th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Radeon R9 FURY |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Desktop |
| Release Date | 2021 | Q3 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $549 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 2019
The Division 2
Dirt Rally 2.0
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Fortnite
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Rise of the Tomb Raider
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 2019 | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Radeon R9 FURY |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 79 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 62 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 39 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon R9 FURY
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 55 | +43% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 55 | +43% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 48 | +25% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 48 | +25% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 41 | +6% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 38.5 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 38 | -1% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 36 | -6% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 31 | -19% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 30.3 | -21% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon R9 FURY
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 7.9 | -45% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 9.07 | -36% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 9.51 | -33% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 9.65 | -32% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 10.86 | -24% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 14.26 | |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,598
Radeon R9 FURY444% better
17,54317% of 104,598
The Radeon R9 FURY has 444% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is ranked 293rd with a score of 3,222, and the Radeon R9 FURY is ranked 128th with a score of 17,543.
Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
Radeon R9 FURY
31.9520% of 161.45
The Radeon R9 FURY has 49% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon R9 FURY's 31.95 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 470 | 17,624.5 | +447% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 17,604.5 | +446% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 17,543 | +444% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 17,401 | +440% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 17,282 | +436% |
| Radeon RX Vega 10 | 3,389 | +5% |
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | 3,225 | +0% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | 3,222 | |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | -0% |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | -6% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon R9 FURY
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 970 | 48.73 | +53% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 41.83 | +31% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 36.09 | +13% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 35.53 | +11% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | +0% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | -8% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | -17% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | -30% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -36% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Radeon R9 FURY |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 676.5 | 4,712 (+596.53%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 784 | 4,720 (+502.04%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 15,662 | 80,439 (+413.59%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 2,495 | 14,580 (+484.37%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 11,380 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,691 | 14,860 (+302.6%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 83.5 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 9,593 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 799 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Radeon R9 FURY |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Tiger Lake GT1 | Fiji |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 8,900 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Radeon R9 FURY |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 512 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 4,096 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Radeon R9 FURY |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 275 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 2x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Radeon R9 FURY |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 3,584 |
| Shading Units | 256 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 56 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 16 | 224 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 64 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 1,000 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,350 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Radeon R9 FURY |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 10.8 GPixel/s | 64 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 21.6 GTexel/s | 224 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 691.2 GFLOPS | 7.17 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS | 448 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | Radeon R9 FURY |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.