PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) vs AMD Radeon 780M

Intel
VS
AMD
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,937
Radeon 780M285% better
12,41312% of 104,937

The Radeon 780M has 285% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
Radeon 780M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the Radeon 780M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
Shop Radeon 780M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) GPU

The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in 2021. Its Tiger Lake GT1 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.1 architecture and is fabricated on the 10 nm process.

This GPU is paired with System Shared of VRAM. Its System Shared memory clock and System Shared interface gives it a bandwidth of System Dependent. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.

The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) has the 290th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 780M GPU

The Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q1 2023. Its Phoenix chip that powers the GPU uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 4 nm process.

This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.

The Radeon 780M has the 154th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.83% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1RDNA 3.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release Date2021Q1 2023
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Alone in the Dark (2024)
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Last Epoch
Last Epoch
More games to choose from
More Games

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Low - 1080p
--
80 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
69 FPS
High - 1080p
--
50 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
15 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon 780M
GPUFrames Per Second
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)20.4+41%
Radeon 780M14.5

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon 780M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,937
Radeon 780M285% better
12,41312% of 104,937

The Radeon 780M has 285% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is ranked 290th with a score of 3,222, and the Radeon 780M is ranked 154th with a score of 12,413.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
Radeon 780M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the Radeon 780M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon 780M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
676.5
2,810.5
(+315.45%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
784
3,126
(+298.72%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15,662
47,634.5
(+204.14%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,495
7,882
(+215.91%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
11,380
34,670
(+204.66%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,691
12,144
(+229.02%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
83.5
188.6
(+125.87%)
PassMark G3D Mark
--
7,088
PassMark G2D Mark
--
867
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
CodenameTiger Lake GT1Phoenix
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1RDNA 3.0
Process Size10 nm4 nm
Transistors--25,390 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared
L1 Cache--128 KB
L2 Cache--2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Bus InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Stream Processors (SP)--768
Shading Units256--
Compute Units (CU)--12
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1648
Render Output Units (ROP)832
Ray Tracing Cores--12
Core Clock Speed350 MHz800 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,350 MHz2,700 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Pixel Fill Rate10.8 GPixel/s86.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate21.6 GTexel/s129.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance691.2 GFLOPS8.29 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance172.8 GFLOPS518.4 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.