Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) vs AMD Radeon 780M

VS
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,598
Radeon 780M297% better
12,78512% of 104,598

The Radeon 780M has 297% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
Radeon 780M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the Radeon 780M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
Shop Radeon 780M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) GPU

The Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in 2021. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tiger Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Memory

The UHD Graphics Xe has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The UHD Graphics Xe includes 256 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,350 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The UHD Graphics Xe has the 293rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 780M GPU

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Phoenix) and is manufactured on a 4 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 780M includes 768 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 800 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,700 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 12 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 780M has the 156th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 12.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1RDNA 3.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release Date2021Q1 2023
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for God of War Ragnarök
God of War Ragnarök
Display FPS for Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Space Marine 2
Display FPS for Star Wars Outlaws
Star Wars Outlaws
Display FPS for Black Myth: Wukong
Black Myth: Wukong
Display FPS for Once Human
Once Human
Display FPS for The First Descendant
The First Descendant
Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for God of War Ragnarök
God of War Ragnarök
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Low - 1080p
--
25 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
25 FPS
High - 1080p
--
22 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
19 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon 780M
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon 780M19.1
Radeon 740M10.5-45%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon 780M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
3,2223% of 104,598
Radeon 780M297% better
12,78512% of 104,598

The Radeon 780M has 297% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) is ranked 293rd with a score of 3,222, and the Radeon 780M is ranked 156th with a score of 12,785.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)
No data available
Radeon 780M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) and the Radeon 780M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) orRadeon 780M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
676.5
2,832
(+318.63%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
784
3,184.5
(+306.19%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15,662
48,104.5
(+207.14%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,495
7,974
(+219.6%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
11,380
34,446
(+202.69%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,691
12,364.5
(+234.99%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
83.5
189.2
(+126.59%)
PassMark G3D Mark
--
7,050
PassMark G2D Mark
--
865
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
CodenameTiger Lake GT1Phoenix
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1RDNA 3.0
Process Size10 nm4 nm
Transistors--25,390 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared
L1 Cache--128 KB
L2 Cache--2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Bus InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Stream Processors (SP)--768
Shading Units256--
Compute Units (CU)--12
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1648
Render Output Units (ROP)832
Ray Accelerators--12
Core Clock Speed350 MHz800 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,350 MHz2,700 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
Pixel Fill Rate10.8 GPixel/s86.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate21.6 GTexel/s129.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance691.2 GFLOPS8.29 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance172.8 GFLOPS518.4 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecUHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU)Radeon 780M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.