Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
1,6542% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 64044% better
2,3792% of 104,598
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 44% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
Shop Iris Plus Graphics 640
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) GPU
The Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in 2021. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tiger Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.
Memory
The UHD Graphics Xe has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The UHD Graphics Xe includes 128 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,450 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe has the 398th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2017. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kaby Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has the 335th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | 2021 | Q1 2017 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Our database does not have gaming performance data for the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) or the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
1,6542% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 64044% better
2,3792% of 104,598
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 44% better performance than the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) is ranked 398th with a score of 1,654, and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 is ranked 335th with a score of 2,379.
Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | 2,551 | +54% |
| Iris Graphics 550 | 2,533.5 | +53% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 2,379 | +44% |
| Iris Graphics 540 | 2,211.5 | +34% |
| Radeon R6 M255DX | 2,198 | +33% |
| Radeon R5 (Carrizo) | 1,711 | +3% |
| Iris Graphics 6100 | 1,694.5 | +2% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | 1,654 | |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | 1,589 | -4% |
| Radeon HD 8670D | 1,547 | -6% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) orIris Plus Graphics 640
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 348 | 437 (+25.57%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 404 | 494.5 (+22.4%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 7,982 | 11,248 (+40.92%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,203 | 1,393.5 (+15.84%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,933 | 2,561 (+32.49%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 46.3 | 56.2 (+21.38%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 1,343 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 341 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Tiger Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Size | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 128 | 384 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 8 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 4 | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,450 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 5.8 GPixel/s | 6.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 11.6 GTexel/s | 52.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 371.2 GFLOPS | 844.8 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 92.8 GFLOPS | 211.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.