Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs Intel Arc A350M

VS
Performance
UHD Graphics 770
3,4283% of 104,598
Arc A350M213% better
10,73010% of 104,598

The Arc A350M has 213% better performance than the UHD Graphics 770 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics 770
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics 770 and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop UHD Graphics 770
Shop Arc A350M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel UHD Graphics 770 GPU

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q4 2021. It is built on the Generation 12.2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Alder Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The UHD Graphics 770 includes 256 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,450 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The UHD Graphics 770 has the 284th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Arc A350M GPU

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A350M includes 768 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,150 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 6 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A350M has the 173rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoUHD Graphics 770Arc A350M
ManufacturerIntelIntel
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2Generation 12.7
Market SegmentIntegratedMobile
Release DateQ4 2021Q1 2022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Alone in the Dark (2024)
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Last Epoch
Last Epoch
Display FPS for Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2
Display FPS for Palworld
Palworld
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
UHD Graphics 770Arc A350M
Low - 1080p
21 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
18 FPS
--
High - 1080p
13 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics 770 orArc A350M
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon 780M48+269%
Radeon 760M38.5+196%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)26+100%
Radeon 740M24+85%
UHD Graphics 77013

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics 770 orArc A350M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
UHD Graphics 770
3,4283% of 104,598
Arc A350M213% better
10,73010% of 104,598

The Arc A350M has 213% better performance than the UHD Graphics 770 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The UHD Graphics 770 is ranked 284th with a score of 3,428, and the Arc A350M is ranked 173rd with a score of 10,730.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics 770
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics 770 and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics 770 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5+223%
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+216%
Arc A350M10,730+213%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+208%
T600 Mobile10,498+206%
Radeon R8 M445DX3,775+10%
Radeon RX Vega 53,535+3%
UHD Graphics 7703,428
Radeon RX Vega 103,389-1%
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU)3,225-6%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics 770 orArc A350M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkUHD Graphics 770Arc A350M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
738
3,050
(+313.28%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
856
3,397
(+296.85%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
16,443
36,314.5
(+120.85%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,655
7,147
(+169.19%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
12,097
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,957
10,766
(+172.07%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
86.9
149.3
(+71.81%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,879
--
PassMark G2D Mark
496
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
34.9
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
38.5
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecUHD Graphics 770Arc A350M
CodenameAlder Lake GT1DG2-128
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2Generation 12.7
Process Size10 nm6 nm
Transistors--7,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecUHD Graphics 770Arc A350M
Memory SizeSystem Shared4 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedGDDR6
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent112 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared1,750 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared64 bit
L1 Cache--1.1 MB
L2 Cache--4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecUHD Graphics 770Arc A350M
Bus InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W25 W
OutputsMotherboard DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecUHD Graphics 770Arc A350M
Shading Units256768
Execution Units (EU)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1648
Render Output Units (ROP)824
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)--96
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)--6
Core Clock Speed300 MHz1,150 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,450 MHz2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecUHD Graphics 770Arc A350M
Pixel Fill Rate11.6 GPixel/s52.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate23.2 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance742.4 GFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--844.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecUHD Graphics 770Arc A350M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.