Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

VS
Performance
UHD Graphics 630
1,789.52% of 104,598
Radeon RX Vega M GL451% better
9,8629% of 104,598

The Radeon RX Vega M GL has 451% better performance than the UHD Graphics 630 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics 630
No data available
Radeon RX Vega M GL
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics 630 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop UHD Graphics 630
Shop Radeon RX Vega M GL
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel UHD Graphics 630 GPU

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2017. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Coffee Lake GT2) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The UHD Graphics 630 includes 184 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 23 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 3 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The UHD Graphics 630 has the 379th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.71% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL GPU

The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 22) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The RX Vega M GL has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX Vega M GL includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 931 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,011 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RX Vega M GL has the 182nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoUHD Graphics 630Radeon RX Vega M GL
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5GCN 4.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ3 2017Q1 2018
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Palworld
Palworld
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24
Display FPS for Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Palworld
Palworld
UHD Graphics 630Radeon RX Vega M GL
Low - 1080p
6 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics 630 orRadeon RX Vega M GL
GPUFrames Per Second
UHD Graphics 77011+85%
UHD Graphics 6305.96

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics 630 orRadeon RX Vega M GL
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
UHD Graphics 630
1,789.52% of 104,598
Radeon RX Vega M GL451% better
9,8629% of 104,598

The Radeon RX Vega M GL has 451% better performance than the UHD Graphics 630 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The UHD Graphics 630 is ranked 379th with a score of 1,789.5, and the Radeon RX Vega M GL is ranked 182nd with a score of 9,862.

Performance per dollar
UHD Graphics 630
No data available
Radeon RX Vega M GL
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics 630 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics 630 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:UHD Graphics 630 orRadeon RX Vega M GL
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkUHD Graphics 630Radeon RX Vega M GL
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
414.5
2,072
(+399.88%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
479.5
2,225
(+364.03%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
9,798
38,812
(+296.12%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,211
7,329
(+505.2%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
6,446
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,030
9,380
(+362.07%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
54.5
120.7
(+121.47%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,244
3,764
(+202.57%)
PassMark G2D Mark
301
482
(+60.13%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
18.9
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecUHD Graphics 630Radeon RX Vega M GL
CodenameCoffee Lake GT2Polaris 22
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5GCN 4.0
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors--5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecUHD Graphics 630Radeon RX Vega M GL
Memory SizeSystem Shared4 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedHBM2
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent179.2 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared1,024 bit
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache--1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecUHD Graphics 630Radeon RX Vega M GL
Bus InterfaceRing BusIGP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W65 W
OutputsMotherboard DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecUHD Graphics 630Radeon RX Vega M GL
Stream Processors (SP)--1,280
Shading Units184--
Compute Units (CU)--20
Execution Units (EU)24--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2380
Render Output Units (ROP)332
Core Clock Speed350 MHz931 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,050 MHz1,011 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecUHD Graphics 630Radeon RX Vega M GL
Pixel Fill Rate3.15 GPixel/s32.35 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate24.15 GTexel/s80.88 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance386.4 GFLOPS2.59 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance96.6 GFLOPS161.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecUHD Graphics 630Radeon RX Vega M GL
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.46.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.