Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 531% better performance than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) GPU
The Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2021. It is built on the Generation 11.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Jasper Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The UHD Graphics includes 256 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 850 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The UHD Graphics has the 402nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL GPU
The AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 22) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Pro WX Vega M GL has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro WX Vega M GL includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 931 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,011 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Pro WX Vega M GL has the 179th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q1 2021 | Q2 2018 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 5 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 7 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 4 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | 4.25 | |
| UHD Graphics 620 | 3.3 | -22% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 531% better performance than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) is ranked 402nd with a score of 1,589, and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is ranked 179th with a score of 10,020.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega M GH | 14,302 | +800% |
| Radeon 780M | 12,624.5 | +694% |
| Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | 10,020 | +531% |
| Radeon RX Vega M GL | 9,862 | +521% |
| Radeon 760M | 9,603 | +504% |
| Iris Graphics 6100 | 1,694.5 | +7% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | 1,654 | +4% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | 1,589 | |
| Radeon HD 8670D | 1,547 | -3% |
| UHD Graphics 617 | 1,540.5 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 330 | 2,062 (+524.85%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 372 | 2,213 (+494.89%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 6,977 | 38,986 (+458.78%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,016 | 7,333 (+621.75%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 4,588 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,652 | 9,731 (+489.04%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 31.6 | 132.5 (+319.3%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 4,643 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 402 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 12.6 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 13.7 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Jasper Lake GT1 | Polaris 22 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Size | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 5,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 179.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 700 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 1,024 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 W | 65 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 1,280 |
| Shading Units | 256 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 20 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 32 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 16 | 80 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 850 MHz | 1,011 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 6.8 GPixel/s | 32.35 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 13.6 GTexel/s | 80.88 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 435.2 GFLOPS | 2.59 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 108.8 GFLOPS | 161.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.