Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) vs Intel HD Graphics 520
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) has 13% better performance than the HD Graphics 520 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) and the HD Graphics 520 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) GPU
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q1 2021. Its Jasper Lake GT1 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 11.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 10 nm process.
This integrated card has a TDP of 10 W.
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) has the 407th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.39% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel HD Graphics 520 GPU
The HD Graphics 520 is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q3 2015. Its Skylake GT2 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 9.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.
This GPU is paired with System Shared of VRAM. Its System Shared memory clock and System Shared interface gives it a bandwidth of System Dependent. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The HD Graphics 520 has the 421st highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q1 2021 | Q3 2015 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
X-Plane 11 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 21 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 13 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 12 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega 11 | 30 | +144% |
| UHD Graphics 770 | 30 | +144% |
| Radeon HD 8650G | 17.1 | +39% |
| Radeon RX Vega 10 | 17 | +38% |
| UHD Graphics 630 | 14 | +14% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | 12.3 | |
| UHD Graphics 620 | 12 | -2% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | 11 | -11% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) | 8 | -35% |
| UHD Graphics 610 | 7 | -43% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) has 13% better performance than the HD Graphics 520 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) is ranked 407th with a score of 1,458, and the HD Graphics 520 is ranked 421st with a score of 1,293.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) and the HD Graphics 520 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 617 | 1,540.5 | +6% |
| HD Graphics 620 | 1,508.5 | +3% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | 1,458 | |
| Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | 1,437.5 | -1% |
| Radeon HD 7660D | 1,433 | -2% |
| HD Graphics 6000 | 1,395.5 | -4% |
| HD Graphics 530 | 1,362 | -7% |
| HD Graphics 520 | 1,293.5 | -11% |
| Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | 1,264 | -13% |
| HD Graphics 615 | 1,242.5 | -15% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 312 (+18.63%) | 263 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 355 (+19.53%) | 297 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 8,388 (+25.18%) | 6,700.5 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,106 (+37.65%) | 803.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,654 (+15.22%) | 1,435.5 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 36.9 | 37 (+0.27%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,477 (+69.58%) | 871 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 269 (+26.89%) | 212 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Jasper Lake GT1 | Skylake GT2 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Size | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 24 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 12 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 6 | 3 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 4.8 GPixel/s | 2.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 9.6 GTexel/s | 21.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 307.2 GFLOPS | 345.6 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 76.8 GFLOPS | 86.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.