Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) vs Intel Arc 140V Mobile
The Arc 140V Mobile has 683% better performance than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) and the Arc 140V Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) GPU
The Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q1 2021. It is built on the Generation 11.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Jasper Lake GT1).
Cores and Clock Speeds
The UHD Graphics includes 192 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 800 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 12 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The UHD Graphics has the 439th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 572 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
About the Intel Arc 140V Mobile GPU
The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2024. It is built on the Xe2-LPG GPU microarchitecture (codename Lunar Lake) and is manufactured on a 3 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Arc 140V Mobile includes 1,024 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 8 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 37 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Arc 140V Mobile has the 189th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 572 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | Arc 140V Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Xe2-LPG |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q1 2021 | Q3 2024 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
God of War Ragnarök | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | Arc 140V Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 26 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 26 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 22 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 21 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Arc 140V Mobile | 20.6 | |
| Radeon 780M | 19.1 | -7% |
| Arc 130V Mobile | 15.7 | -24% |
| Radeon 740M | 10.5 | -49% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Arc 140V Mobile has 683% better performance than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) is ranked 439th with a score of 1,458, and the Arc 140V Mobile is ranked 189th with a score of 11,422.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) and the Arc 140V Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Arc Graphics 140T | 12,566 | +762% |
| Radeon 860M | 11,680 | +701% |
| Arc 140V Mobile | 11,422.5 | +683% |
| Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | 10,020 | +587% |
| Radeon 760M | 9,899 | +579% |
| UHD Graphics 617 | 1,540.5 | +6% |
| HD Graphics 620 | 1,508.5 | +3% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | 1,458 | |
| Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | 1,437.5 | -1% |
| Radeon HD 7660D | 1,433 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | Arc 140V Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 312 | 4,077 (+1,206.73%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 355 | 4,328 (+1,119.15%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 8,388 | 54,539 (+550.2%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,106 | 9,825 (+788.34%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 47,590.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,654 | 11,841.5 (+615.93%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 36.9 | 165 (+347.15%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,518 | 5,142 (+238.74%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 305 | 661 (+116.72%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | Arc 140V Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Jasper Lake GT1 | Lunar Lake |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Xe2-LPG |
| Process Size | -- | 3 nm |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | Arc 140V Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
| L2 Cache | -- | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | Arc 140V Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 W | 37 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | Arc 140V Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 192 | 1,024 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 24 | 8 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 12 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 6 | 32 |
| Ray Tracing Units (RTU) | -- | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 800 MHz | 1,950 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | Arc 140V Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 4.8 GPixel/s | 62.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 9.6 GTexel/s | 124.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 307.2 GFLOPS | 3.99 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 76.8 GFLOPS | 998.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | Arc 140V Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.