Intel Iris Xe MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

VS
Performance
Iris Xe MAX640% better
8,2148% of 104,598
GeForce GT 635M
1,1101% of 104,598

The Iris Xe MAX has 640% better performance than the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe MAX
No data available
GeForce GT 635M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe MAX and the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Xe MAX
Shop GeForce GT 635M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Xe MAX GPU

The Intel Iris Xe MAX is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2020. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Xe MAX has 4 GB of LPDDR4X memory, with a 2,133 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 68.26 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Xe MAX includes 768 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,650 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Intel recommends a power supply of at least 200 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Xe MAX has the 203rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.85% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF108) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GT 635M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 635M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 660 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 753 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 635M has the 445th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.06% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Xe MAXGeForce GT 635M
ManufacturerIntelNVIDIA
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1Fermi
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2020Q1 2012
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Display FPS for Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin
Monster Hunter Stories 2
Display FPS for Outriders
Outriders
Display FPS for Hitman 3
Hitman 3
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Iris Xe MAXGeForce GT 635M
Low - 720p
87 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
33 FPS
--
High - 1080p
10 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX orGeForce GT 635M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45015+44%
Radeon 680M12.9+24%
GeForce MX35012+15%
GeForce MX33011.9+14%
Radeon 660M10.9+5%
Iris Xe MAX10.4
GeForce MX2508.23-21%
Radeon RX 560X Mobile7.94-24%
GeForce MX1305.81-44%
Radeon RX 550 Mobile3.58-66%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX orGeForce GT 635M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Xe MAX640% better
8,2148% of 104,598
GeForce GT 635M
1,1101% of 104,598

The Iris Xe MAX has 640% better performance than the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Xe MAX is ranked 203rd with a score of 8,214, and the GeForce GT 635M is ranked 445th with a score of 1,110.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe MAX
No data available
GeForce GT 635M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe MAX and the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro M3000M8,288.5+1%
GeForce MX4508,250+0%
Iris Xe MAX8,214
Radeon RX 560X Mobile8,211.5-0%
Quadro P2000 Mobile8,148-1%
Radeon HD 6730M1,141-86%
NVS 5400M1,119-86%
GeForce GT 635M1,110-86%
GeForce 710M1,106.5-87%
Quadro K1000M1,102-87%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX orGeForce GT 635M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Xe MAXGeForce GT 635M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,743
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,876
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
36,993
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,333
--
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
20,649.5
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,024
(+556.09%)
1,223
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
105
--
PassMark G3D Mark
1,972
(+252.14%)
560
PassMark G2D Mark
308
(+81.18%)
170
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Xe MAXGeForce GT 635M
CodenameDG1GF108
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1Fermi
Process Size10 nm40 nm
Transistors--585 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Xe MAXGeForce GT 635M
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeLPDDR4XDDR3
Memory Bandwidth68.26 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock2,133 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache--64 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Xe MAXGeForce GT 635M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W35 W
Suggested PSU200 W--
OutputsNo outputsDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Xe MAXGeForce GT 635M
Shading Units768--
CUDA Cores--96
Execution Units (EU)96--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4816
Render Output Units (ROP)244
Core Clock Speed300 MHz660 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,650 MHz753 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Xe MAXGeForce GT 635M
Pixel Fill Rate39.6 GPixel/s1.9 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate79.2 GTexel/s7.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.53 TFLOPS182.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance633.6 GFLOPS15.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Xe MAXGeForce GT 635M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.01.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.65.1

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.