PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Iris Xe MAX vs AMD Radeon 680M

Intel
VS
AMD
Performance
Iris Xe MAX
8,2148% of 104,937
Radeon 680M27% better
10,39910% of 104,937

The Radeon 680M has 27% better performance than the Iris Xe MAX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe MAX
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe MAX and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Xe MAX
Shop Radeon 680M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Xe MAX GPU

The Iris Xe MAX is a mobile graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q4 2020. Its DG1 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.1 architecture and is fabricated on the 10 nm process.

Memory

This GPU is paired with 4 GB of LPDDR4X VRAM. Its 2,133 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 68.26 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

Compatibility

This mobile card has a TDP of 25 W. Intel recommends using a power supply of at least 200 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Xe MAX has the 200th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.83% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU

The Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q1 2022. Its Rembrandt chip that powers the GPU uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 6 nm process.

Compatibility

This mobile card has a TDP of 50 W.

Benchmark Performance

The Radeon 680M has the 173rd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.91% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Xe MAXRadeon 680M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1RDNA 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2020Q1 2022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Iris Xe MAXRadeon 680M
Low - 1080p
--
34 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
25 FPS
High - 1080p
--
24 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
23 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX orRadeon 680M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce RTX 2050 (Mobile)33+42%
Radeon 680M23.3
Radeon RX 560X (Mobile)20.2-13%
Radeon 660M14.8-36%
Arc A370M11.4-51%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX orRadeon 680M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Xe MAX
8,2148% of 104,937
Radeon 680M27% better
10,39910% of 104,937

The Radeon 680M has 27% better performance than the Iris Xe MAX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Xe MAX is ranked 200th with a score of 8,214, and the Radeon 680M is ranked 173rd with a score of 10,399.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe MAX
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe MAX and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+29%
T600 Mobile10,498+28%
Radeon 680M10,399+27%
Quadro M4000M10,259+25%
GeForce MX55010,005+22%
Quadro M3000M8,288.5+1%
GeForce MX4508,250+0%
Iris Xe MAX8,214
Radeon RX 560X (Mobile)8,211.5-0%
Quadro P2000 Mobile8,148-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX orRadeon 680M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Xe MAXRadeon 680M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,743
2,313
(+32.7%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,876
2,594.5
(+38.3%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
36,993
43,250
(+16.91%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,333
6,865
(+8.4%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
20,649.5
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,024
10,377
(+29.32%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
105
145
(+38.1%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,972
--
PassMark G2D Mark
309
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 680M
CodenameDG1Rembrandt
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1RDNA 2.0
Process Size10 nm6 nm
Transistors--13,100 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 680M
Memory Size4 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeLPDDR4XSystem Shared
Memory Bandwidth68.26 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock2,133 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface128 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache--128 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 680M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W50 W
Suggested PSU200 W--
OutputsNo outputsDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 680M
Stream Processors (SP)--768
Shading Units768--
Compute Units (CU)--12
Execution Units (EU)96--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4848
Render Output Units (ROP)2432
Ray Tracing Cores--12
Core Clock Speed300 MHz2,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,650 MHz2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 680M
Pixel Fill Rate39.6 GPixel/s70.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate79.2 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.53 TFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance633.6 GFLOPS211.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 680M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.02.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.