Intel Iris Xe MAX vs AMD Radeon 660M

VS
Performance
Iris Xe MAX22% better
8,2148% of 104,598
Radeon 660M
6,7436% of 104,598

The Iris Xe MAX has 22% better performance than the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe MAX
No data available
Radeon 660M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe MAX and the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Xe MAX
Shop Radeon 660M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Xe MAX GPU

The Intel Iris Xe MAX is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2020. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Xe MAX has 4 GB of LPDDR4X memory, with a 2,133 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 68.26 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Xe MAX includes 768 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,650 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Intel recommends a power supply of at least 200 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Xe MAX has the 203rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.85% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 660M GPU

The AMD Radeon 660M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 660M includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,500 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 6 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 40 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 660M has the 223rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Xe MAXRadeon 660M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1RDNA 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2020Q1 2022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur's Gate 3
Display FPS for F1 23
F1 23
Display FPS for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
Display FPS for Diablo 4
Diablo 4
Display FPS for Far Cry 6
Far Cry 6

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Iris Xe MAXRadeon 660M
Low - 1080p
--
35 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
30 FPS
High - 1080p
--
23 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
6 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX orRadeon 660M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45013.4+139%
Radeon 680M7.41+32%
Radeon 660M5.6

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX orRadeon 660M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Xe MAX22% better
8,2148% of 104,598
Radeon 660M
6,7436% of 104,598

The Iris Xe MAX has 22% better performance than the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Xe MAX is ranked 203rd with a score of 8,214, and the Radeon 660M is ranked 223rd with a score of 6,743.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe MAX
No data available
Radeon 660M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe MAX and the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro M3000M8,288.5+1%
GeForce MX4508,250+0%
Iris Xe MAX8,214
Radeon RX 560X Mobile8,211.5-0%
Quadro P2000 Mobile8,148-1%
Radeon R9 M290X6,817-17%
Radeon Pro 4606,749-18%
Radeon 660M6,743-18%
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)6,736-18%
GeForce MX3506,166-25%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe MAX orRadeon 660M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Xe MAXRadeon 660M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,743
(+12.89%)
1,544
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,876
(+9.42%)
1,714.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
36,993
(+17.38%)
31,514.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,333
(+30.63%)
4,848
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
20,649.5
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,024
(+13.54%)
7,067
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
105
121.3
(+15.52%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,972
--
PassMark G2D Mark
308
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 660M
CodenameDG1Rembrandt
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1RDNA 2.0
Process Size10 nm6 nm
Transistors--13,100 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 660M
Memory Size4 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeLPDDR4XSystem Shared
Memory Bandwidth68.26 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock2,133 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface128 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache--128 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 660M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W40 W
Suggested PSU200 W--
OutputsNo outputsDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 660M
Stream Processors (SP)--384
Shading Units768--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Execution Units (EU)96--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4824
Render Output Units (ROP)2416
Ray Accelerators--6
Core Clock Speed300 MHz1,500 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,650 MHz1,900 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 660M
Pixel Fill Rate39.6 GPixel/s30.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate79.2 GTexel/s45.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.53 TFLOPS1,459 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance633.6 GFLOPS91.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Xe MAXRadeon 660M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.02.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.