PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Intel
VS
AMD
Performance
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
6,523.56% of 104,937
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL54% better
10,02010% of 104,937

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 54% better performance than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
No data available
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Shop Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) GPU

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q3 2020. Its Tiger Lake GT2 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.1 architecture and is fabricated on the 10 nm process.

This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) has the 222nd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL GPU

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is an integrated graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2018. Its Polaris 22 chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 4.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 4 GB of HBM2 VRAM. Its 700 MHz memory clock and 1,024 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

This integrated card has a TDP of 65 W.

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has the 176th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.55% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1GCN 4.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ3 2020Q2 2018
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
More games to choose from
More Games

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Low - 1080p
40 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
35 FPS
--
High - 1080p
26 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
20 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) orRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPUFrames Per Second
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)20.4
Radeon 780M14.5-29%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) orRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
6,523.56% of 104,937
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL54% better
10,02010% of 104,937

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 54% better performance than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) is ranked 222nd with a score of 6,523.5, and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is ranked 176th with a score of 10,020.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
No data available
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) orRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,559.5
2,062
(+32.22%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,736
2,213
(+27.48%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
26,929.5
38,986
(+44.77%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,139
7,333
(+42.69%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
19,106
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
6,873
9,731
(+41.58%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
98
132.5
(+35.2%)
PassMark G3D Mark
2,683
4,643
(+73.05%)
PassMark G2D Mark
358
400
(+11.73%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
CodenameTiger Lake GT2Polaris 22
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1GCN 4.0
Process Size10 nm14 nm
Transistors--5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Memory SizeSystem Shared4 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedHBM2
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent179.2 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared1,024 bit
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Bus InterfaceRing BusIGP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W65 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Stream Processors (SP)--1,280
Shading Units768--
Compute Units (CU)--20
Execution Units (EU)96--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4880
Render Output Units (ROP)2432
Core Clock Speed300 MHz931 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,100 MHz1,011 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Pixel Fill Rate26.4 GPixel/s32.35 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate52.8 GTexel/s80.88 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.69 TFLOPS2.59 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance422.4 GFLOPS161.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.