Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) vs AMD Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M has 90% better performance than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and the Radeon 780M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) GPU
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q3 2020. Its Tiger Lake GT2 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.1 architecture and is fabricated on the 10 nm process.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) has the 222nd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon 780M GPU
The Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q1 2023. Its Phoenix chip that powers the GPU uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 4 nm process.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The Radeon 780M has the 154th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.83% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
Info | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | RDNA 3.0 |
Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
Release Date | Q3 2020 | Q1 2023 |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
Low - 1080p | 40 FPS | 80 FPS(+98.02%) |
Medium - 1080p | 35 FPS | 69 FPS(+94.92%) |
High - 1080p | 26 FPS | 50 FPS(+95.31%) |
Ultra - 1080p | 20 FPS(+40.69%) | 15 FPS |
QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
GPU | Frames Per Second | |
---|---|---|
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | 20.4 | |
Radeon 780M | 14.5 | -29% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
---|---|---|
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. |
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon 780M has 90% better performance than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) is ranked 222nd with a score of 6,523.5, and the Radeon 780M is ranked 154th with a score of 12,413.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and the Radeon 780M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX Vega M GH | 14,302 | +119% |
Radeon 780M | 12,413 | +90% |
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | 10,020 | +54% |
Radeon RX Vega M GL | 9,862 | +51% |
Radeon 760M | 9,603 | +47% |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | 6,523.5 | |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | 5,483 | -16% |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) | 5,309.5 | -19% |
Radeon RX Vega 7 | 5,244 | -20% |
UHD Graphics (Alder Lake, 64EU) | 4,832.5 | -26% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
---|---|---|---|
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
Benchmark | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 1,559.5 | 2,810.5 (+80.22%) |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1,736 | 3,126 (+80.07%) |
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 26,929.5 | 47,634.5 (+76.89%) |
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,139 | 7,882 (+53.38%) |
3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 19,106 | 34,670 (+81.46%) |
3DMark 11 Performance Score | 6,873 | 12,144 (+76.69%) |
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 98 | 188.6 (+92.45%) |
PassMark G3D Mark | 2,683 | 7,088 (+164.18%) |
PassMark G2D Mark | 358 | 867 (+142.18%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
Spec | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
Codename | Tiger Lake GT2 | Phoenix |
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | RDNA 3.0 |
Process Size | 10 nm | 4 nm |
Transistors | -- | 25,390 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
Spec | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
L1 Cache | -- | 128 KB |
L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
Spec | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
Spec | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 768 |
Shading Units | 768 | -- |
Compute Units (CU) | -- | 12 |
Execution Units (EU) | 96 | -- |
Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | 48 |
Render Output Units (ROP) | 24 | 32 |
Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 12 |
Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,100 MHz | 2,700 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
Spec | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
Pixel Fill Rate | 26.4 GPixel/s | 86.4 GPixel/s |
Texture Fill Rate | 52.8 GTexel/s | 129.6 GTexel/s |
FP32 Performance | 1.69 TFLOPS | 8.29 TFLOPS |
FP64 Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | 518.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
Spec | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.