Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

VS
Performance
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
5,3325% of 104,598
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL88% better
10,02010% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 88% better performance than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
No data available
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
Shop Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) GPU

The Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2020. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tiger Lake GT2) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 includes 640 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 20 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 has the 240th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 22) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro WX Vega M GL has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro WX Vega M GL includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 931 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,011 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro WX Vega M GL has the 179th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1GCN 4.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ3 2020Q2 2018
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Last Epoch
Last Epoch
Display FPS for Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2
Display FPS for Palworld
Palworld
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Low - 1080p
10 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
8 FPS
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) orRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon 780M21.1+173%
Radeon 760M19.6+153%
Radeon RX Vega 1010.5+36%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)8+3%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)7.74

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) orRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
5,3325% of 104,598
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL88% better
10,02010% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 88% better performance than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) is ranked 240th with a score of 5,332, and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is ranked 179th with a score of 10,020.

Performance per dollar
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
No data available
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) orRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,180
2,062
(+74.75%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,333.5
2,213
(+65.95%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
21,931
38,986
(+77.77%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,010
7,333
(+82.87%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
15,172
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,598
9,731
(+73.83%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
86.2
132.5
(+53.71%)
PassMark G3D Mark
2,683
4,643
(+73.05%)
PassMark G2D Mark
368
406
(+10.33%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
43.8
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
57.3
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
CodenameTiger Lake GT2Polaris 22
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1GCN 4.0
Process Size10 nm14 nm
Transistors--5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Memory SizeSystem Shared4 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedHBM2
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent179.2 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared1,024 bit
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Bus InterfaceRing BusIGP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W65 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Stream Processors (SP)--1,280
Shading Units640--
Compute Units (CU)--20
Execution Units (EU)80--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4080
Render Output Units (ROP)2032
Core Clock Speed300 MHz931 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,100 MHz1,011 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Pixel Fill Rate22 GPixel/s32.35 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate44 GTexel/s80.88 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,408 GFLOPS2.59 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance352 GFLOPS161.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.