Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2,7663% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 6555% better
2,8943% of 104,598
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 5% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Shop Iris Plus Graphics 655
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 GPU
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q3 2014. It is built on the Generation 8.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Broadwell GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has the 313th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Coffee Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has the 306th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q3 2014 | Q2 2018 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Our database does not have gaming performance data for the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2,7663% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 6555% better
2,8943% of 104,598
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 5% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is ranked 313th with a score of 2,766, and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 is ranked 306th with a score of 2,894.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | 3,222 | +16% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | +16% |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | +9% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 2,985 | +8% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 2,894 | +5% |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 2,862.5 | +3% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | 2,766 | |
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 2,762 | -0% |
| Radeon R6 M340DX | 2,681 | -3% |
| UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | 2,551 | -8% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 6200 orIris Plus Graphics 655
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 604.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 684 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 15,387.5 (+7.28%) | 14,343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,736.5 | 1,983 (+14.2%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,094 | 3,180.5 (+2.8%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 74 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,471 | 1,746 (+18.69%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 574 (+57.69%) | 364 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 48 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 6 | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,100 MHz | 1,050 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 6.6 GPixel/s | 6.3 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 52.8 GTexel/s | 50.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | 806.4 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | 201.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.